Media Blog

The LA Times and Dunphy

Patterico has written a long post about LAPD officer and NRO columnist Jack Dunphy. Dunphy, who writes under a pseudonym, has published op-eds in the LA Times before, but suddenly the Times stopped accepting his submissions on the grounds that it doesn’t publish op-eds by authors using pseudonyms. Patterico called up the LA Times brass and reports:

I wrote Editorial Page Editor Andrés Martinez and Op-Ed and Current Editor Nick Goldberg, and asked them what was up. Nick Goldberg — whom I have met before and who strikes me as a very decent guy — was kind enough to speak with me about this yesterday.
Goldberg said: “We have not banned [Dunphy] from the paper.” He said, however, that he wants to be very careful about publishing pieces written under pseudonyms. It is not something that should be done lightly or often, he said, and any exceptions should be rare. The op-ed page may run pieces under a pseudonym if the subject is very important, if they can’t get a similar piece from an author using his or her own name, and if there is a good reason to protect the author’s identity.
Under the principles Goldberg articulated to me, it seems like a no-brainer that The Times should continue to publish pieces by Jack Dunphy. The LAPD is a very important topic in this city. I am not familiar with any other officer who comes close to Dunphy in his ability to articulate the views of the rank and file in highly readable and entertaining prose. And, given his history of criticizing Bratton, there is ample reason to protect Dunphy’s identity. In my opinion, applying Goldberg’s own criteria, Dunphy should continue to be published.

First, as Patterico points out, it’s not like Dunphy is an unknown entity. He’s published dozens of pieces for NRO and several pieces for the LA Times.  He’s disclosed where he works and what he does. To free himself to write openly about the LAPD and presumably to ensure his physical safety, he’s adopted a pseudonym. I think under these circumstances, the LA Times could make an exception.
Furthermore, the LA Times news pages frequently cite anonymous sources — it was one of the papers that exposed the SWIFT bank data program — about whom we know little and of whose motives we know nothing. It seems strange that the Times would apply a stricter standard to the opinion pages than to news.
I hope the LA Times sees the error in its reasoning, but if not, oh well. More Dunphy for NRO.

Most Popular

Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More
Elections

Kamala Harris Runs for Queen

I’m going to let you in on a secret about the 2020 presidential contest: Unless unforeseen circumstances lead to a true wave election, the legislative stakes will be extremely low. The odds are heavily stacked against Democrats’ retaking the Senate, and that means that even if a Democrat wins the White House, ... Read More
Culture

What We’ve Learned about Jussie Smollett

It’s been a few weeks since March 26, when all charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and the actor declared that his version of events had been proven correct. How’s that going? Smollett’s celebrity defenders have gone quiet. His publicists and lawyers are dodging reporters. The @StandwithJussie ... Read More
Politics & Policy

But Why Is Guatemala Hungry?

I really, really don’t want to be on the “Nicolas Kristof Wrote Something Dumb” beat, but, Jiminy Cricket! Kristof has taken a trip to Guatemala, with a young woman from Arizona State University in tow. “My annual win-a-trip journey,” he writes. Reporting from Guatemala, he discovers that many ... Read More