Kavanaugh Accuser Hasn’t Responded to Grassley’s Hearing Invitation

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh arrives with Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R, Iowa) for the second day of his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., September 5, 2018. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)

Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley said Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford has not yet accepted an invitation to testify next Monday regarding her allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were in high school.

Ford’s lawyer, who previously said her client would be willing testify under oath before the committee, has not yet responded to Grassley’s multiple attempts to set up a preliminary phone call.

“We have reached out to her in the last 36 hours three or four times by email and we have not heard from them, and it kind of raises the question: Do they want to come to the public hearing or not?” Grassley said Tuesday morning on The Hugh Hewitt Show.

Asked if he would hold the hearing absent Ford, Grassley said he couldn’t see the rationale for doing so.

“What would be the purpose of the hearing if Dr. Ford doesn’t want to respond?” he said.

Kavanaugh, who has vigorously denied the allegations, has already committed to attending the Monday hearing and spent roughly nine hours at the White House Monday in preparation.

“Judge Kavanaugh looks forward to a hearing where he can clear his name of this false allegation. He stands ready to testify tomorrow if the Senate is ready to hear him,” White House spokesman Raj Shah confirmed Tuesday.

Ford, a California psychology professor and Democratic donor, came forward Sunday as the author of a previously anonymous letter sent to Senator Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. In the letter, which she sent through her congresswoman, Ford accused Kavanaugh of pinning her down and attempting to remove her clothes while “stumbling drunk” at a house party in suburban Maryland 36 years ago.

Judiciary Committee Republicans began Tuesday morning to question Ford’s hesitance to respond to the hearing invitation. 

“That’s very puzzling to me I have said from the beginning that these are very serious allegations and she deserves to be heard. She’s now being given an opportunity to come before the Senate Judiciary Committee and to answer questions and I really hope that she doesn’t pass up that opportunity,” Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who called on Ford Monday to testify under oath, told reporters when asked about the lack of responsiveness.

Democratic leadership has called for the hearings to be delayed until an FBI investigation can be conducted while Republicans have argued the allegation does not fall within FBI jurisdiction. Additionally, Feinstein objected Tuesday to Republican demands that only Kavanaugh and his accuser testify during the hearing.

“Chairman Grassley today said there would be only two witnesses invited to testify at the Kavanaugh hearing next week on sexual-assault allegations. Compare that to the 22 witnesses at the 1991 Anita Hill hearing and it’s impossible to take this process seriously,” she said. “What about other witnesses like Kavanaugh’s friend Mark Judge? What about individuals who were previously told about this incident? What about experts who can speak to the effects of this kind of trauma on a victim? This is another attempt by Republicans to rush this nomination and not fully vet Judge Kavanaugh.”

Most Popular


In Defense of Coleman Hughes

Picture the scene: A young man walks into a congressional hearing to offer witness testimony. His grandfather was barbarically brutalized by people who are now long dead. The nation in which he resides built its wealth of his grandfather’s brutalization. The question: Should his fellow citizens pay the young ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Making Sense of the Iran Chaos

One would prefer that correct decisions be made according to careful, deliberate plan. But a correct decision made impulsively, through a troubling process, is still nonetheless correct, and so it is with Donald Trump’s decision to refrain from military action against Iran. The proposed strike would represent a ... Read More

College Leaders Should Learn from Oberlin

Thanks to their social-justice warrior mindset, the leaders of Oberlin College have caused an Ohio jury to hit it with $44 million in compensatory and punitive damages in a case where the school couldn't resist the urge to side with its “woke” students against a local business. College leaders should learn ... Read More
Film & TV

Toy Story 4: A National Anthem

The Toy Story franchise is the closest thing we have to an undisputed national anthem, a popular belief that celebrates what we think we all stand for — cooperation, ingenuity, and simple values, such as perpetual hope. This fact of our infantile, desensitized culture became apparent back in 2010 when I took a ... Read More

Joe and the Segs

Joe Biden has stepped in it, good and deep. Biden, if he has any hope of ever being elected president, will be dependent on residual goodwill among African Americans from his time as Barack Obama’s loyal and deferential vice president — so deferential, in fact, that he stood aside for Herself in 2016 even ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Madcap Caution of Donald Trump

The worry last week was that the Trump administration was ginning up fake intelligence about Iran blowing up oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz to justify a war against Iran. Then, this week, President Donald Trump said the Iranian attacks weren’t a big deal. The episode is another indication of the ... Read More