News

Health Care

California Dems Split Over Funding Level For Illegal Immigrants’ Health Care

California Governor Gavin Newsom (Beck Diefenbach/Reuters)

California Democrats are squaring off this week over how many of the states’ illegal immigrants should be eligible for publicly funded health care.

California governor Gavin Newsom presented a budget proposal this week that calls for $98 million in new spending to make all low-income illegal immigrants ages 19 to 26 eligible for the Medi-Cal program.

Meanwhile, Democrats in the state assembly have introduced a bill that would cover all illegal immigrants over the age of 19 at a cost of $3.4 billion. A third bill, introduced by Democrats in the state senate, would cover illegal immigrants ages 19-26 as well as those over 65 and over.

Proponents of a more expansive public option for illegal immigrants have argued that Sacramento can accommodate the larger price tag due to the state’s projected $21.5 billion budget surplus for the year.

“They work in our hotels, they work picking the fruit and vegetables, they work as landscapers, they work in hospitals,” said state senator Maria Elena Durazo, a Los Angeles Democrat who authored the more expansive senate bill. “I don’t think they should be treated differently from other Californians.”

Newsom, however, has argued that expanding the eligible pool to immigrants over 25 would introduce new costs that might overwhelm the system in the event of an economic slowdown.

“3.4 billion reasons why it’s a challenge,” Newsom said at a Monday press conference, referring to the estimated cost of covering all illegal immigrants in the state.

Medi-Cal already covers all residents under 18 and all pregnant women regardless of legal status. Since the state legislature is comprised of 75 precent Democrats, there is no significant opposition to its further expansion, the only disagreement is over the scale of that expansion.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Making Sense of the Iran Chaos

One would prefer that correct decisions be made according to careful, deliberate plan. But a correct decision made impulsively, through a troubling process, is still nonetheless correct, and so it is with Donald Trump’s decision to refrain from military action against Iran. The proposed strike would represent a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

New Deal . . . Conservatives?

I am second to none in my admiration for William F. Buckley Jr., but on matters of electoral politics his judgment was not exactly infallible. For example, he floated the idea of having former president Dwight Eisenhower join Barry Goldwater’s ticket as the vice-presidential nominee, which was possibly ... Read More