News

U.S.

FBI Arrests Calif. Man for Threatening Boston Globe over Trump Editorials

The Boston Globe‘s logo is seen on the newspaper’s building in Boston, Mass., June 15, 2009. (Brian Snyder/Reuters)

A California man was arrested by the FBI on Thursday after he allegedly threatened to kill Boston Globe employees over their editorial campaign in support of a free press.

The 68-year-old suspect is accused of calling the Globe newsroom several times and threatening to shoot employees in the head and kill “every” employee, calling them the “enemy of the people,” a phrase President Trump has used to describe the press.

An FBI SWAT team arrested the man at his home in Encino, Calif., on Thursday. He owned several firearms, one of which was purchased recently, the FBI said. He is charged with the felony of making threatening communications in interstate commerce.

Prosecutors said the man’s threats began immediately after the Globe’s August 10 announcement of a coordinated, nationwide editorial campaign to push back on the president’s criticisms of the media. On August 16, the day the editorials were published, the man allegedly called the newsroom and “threatened to shoot Globe employees in the head ‘later today, at 4 o’clock.’”

“Why don’t you call Mueller, maybe he can help you out, buddy,” the man said, referring to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in one of the 14 profanity-laced calls he made to the Globe, according to the FBI.

“We are grateful to the F.B.I., the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the Boston Police, and local authorities in California for the work they did in protecting the Globe while threats were coming in, for investigating the source, and for making this arrest. We couldn’t have asked for a stronger response,” a spokesperson for the Globe said in a statement. “While it was unsettling for many of our staffers to be threatened in such a way, nobody — really, nobody — let it get in the way of the important work of this institution.”

The man reportedly vowed to keep targeting the Globe until it stops “attacking the president, the duly elected president of the United States, in the continuation of your treasonous and seditious acts.” He will appear on Thursday in Los Angeles federal court and later in U.S. District Court in Boston. He faces up to five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 if convicted.

IN THE NEWS: ‘[WATCH] Cuomo or Nixon: Who Detests Trump the Most?’

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More
Books

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More