News

U.S.

Ford’s Polygraph Statement Inconsistent with Letter to Feinstein

Senator Dianne Feinstein on Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C., May 8, 2017. (Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters )

Lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused Brett Kavanaugh of attempting to sexually assault her when they were both in high school, released the results of a polygraph test she passed in August on Wednesday, one day before she is scheduled to publicly testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee alongside Kavanaugh.

Almost immediately after the results’ release, inconsistencies in Ford’s testimony were pointed out. The written statement used as the basis for the polygraph test said there were “four people” present at the party where the alleged assault occurred but, at some point, “four people” was crossed out and replaced with “four boys and a couple of girls.”

Both of these versions of events are inconsistent with the letter Ford sent in July to Senator Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, in which she described the party attendees as consisting of “me and four others.” They also clashed with what Ford’s statement to the Washington Post that there were “four boys” present at the party, a claim she has since retracted, saying instead that her friend Leland Keyser also attended the party but did not know of the assault.

In the Post article, published September 16, Ford conceded that her therapist’s notes detailing her 2013 description of the assault were also inconsistent with her recollection. In the notes, which Ford’s attorneys have said they will not provide to the Senate, the therapist mistakenly wrote that four boys participated in the attack, according to Ford.

Thus far, Ford has identified Keyser, Kavanaugh, and his Georgetown Prep classmates Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth as being present at the party where she says Kavanaugh’s attempted assault occurred.

The Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation Friday morning after hearing from Kavanaugh and Ford on Thursday, though Democrats on the panel have called for the nomination to be withdrawn in the wake of allegations levied Wednesday by a third woman, who says Kavanaugh assaulted girls at numerous parties and was “present” when she was gang raped at one such party.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More
Books

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More