News

Immigration

Trump Signals Displeasure with Border-Security Compromise

President Trump during a Cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., February 12, 2019. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)

President Trump on Tuesday said he was “extremely unhappy” with a border-security compromise reached by lawmakers on Monday night, but would not commit to vetoing the proposal if it passes Congress.

Lawmakers on Monday reached a tentative deal to prevent another partial government shutdown that would include $1.375 billion to construct new fencing on the southern border, well below the $5.7 billion the president wants for a concrete wall. The deadline for Congress to approve a deal and Trump to sign it is Friday.

“I am extremely unhappy with what the Democrats have given us,” Trump said Tuesday, while stopping short of a threat to veto the compromise if it reaches his desk. “I don’t think you’re going to see a shutdown. If you did have it, it’s the Democrats’ fault.”

House minority leader Kevin McCarthy, meanwhile, tried to paint the compromise as a win for Republicans, arguing that it represented a Democratic capitulation to Trump’s demand for border-wall funding.

“You have to remember where [Speaker] Nancy Pelosi was — she who said no money for a wall,” McCarthy said on CNBC. “The Democrats have now agreed to more than 55 miles of new barrier being built.”

McCarthy also said that Democrats had softened their demands on funding for beds at Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers.

“The Democrats changed course when they said, ‘There would be no detention beds,” the California Republican said. “They backed away on that. Now we are able to have those detention beds again. It’s not as high a number as we would have liked.”

Pelosi’s office immediately challenged McCarthy’s narrative, saying her party has not caved to Trump’s hard-line immigration demands.

“There is no wall money in this agreement,” the speaker’s deputy chief of staff Drew Hammill told CNBC. “This agreement has the same amount of funding for physical barriers that last year’s omnibus had.”

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?

If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.

LEARN MORE

Most Popular

Elections

A Reckoning Is in Store for Democrats

The crisis of the Democrats is becoming more evident each week. Those of us who have been loudly predicting for years that the Russian-collusion argument would be exposed as a defamatory farce, and that the authors of it would eventually pay for it, are bemused at the fallback position of the Trump-haters: that ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Ilhan Omar: A Hostage Situation

‘It has to stop,” says Representative Ilhan Omar. No, it does not. Representative Omar, the Jew-hating Minnesota Democrat, is engaged in one of her usual games of misdirection, a pattern of hers that by now is familiar enough to be predicted: She says something outrageously stupid, offensive, ... Read More
Elections

Why ‘Stop Sanders’?

'Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?” T. S. Eliot asked. “Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” And where is the intelligence we have lost in cleverness? Cleverness is the plague of our political classes, an influenza of the intellect. The consultants are always trying to ... Read More
Immigration

Trump Is Hell-Bent on ‘Owning the Libs’

President Trump is looking into giving a free trip to San Francisco, New Orleans, or other great American cities to tens of thousands of refugees from Central America. All so he can own the libs. “Owning the libs” is one of those phrases to have emerged over the past few years that vacillates between ... Read More