Warren Caught Off Guard by Ethics Complaint During Debate

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D, Mass.) arrives for a procedural vote on the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., October 5, 2018. (Yuri Gripas/Reuters)

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) was caught off guard during her debate Tuesday with Republican challenger Geoff Diehl when he accused Warren of “illegally” using her vote against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to raise campaign funds.

Warren at first tried to avoid the question, but when pressed by debate moderators she admitted she did not know what Diehl was referencing.

“Actually, I don’t know,” she said. “I will check into it, but I don’t know.”

The ethics complaint Diehl was referring to, filed by the conservative Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, centers around a fundraising email Warren sent out urging supporters to sign a petition asking the Senate to delay the confirmation vote on Kavanaugh so the Senate would have more time to investigate sexual-assault allegations against him.

The email included an encouragement to donate to Warren’s reelection campaign and a “Donate Now” button.

FACT claims Warren violated Senate ethics rules by blurring the line between her no vote on Kavanaugh and fundraising efforts, and has called for an ethics investigation to be initiated.

“This is a clear violation of Senate Ethics rules which safeguard against the appearance or actuality of elected officials ‘cashing in’ on their official position for political purposes,” FACT executive director Kendra Arnold said in a press release Monday.

Warren later called the complaint “frivolous” and said that FACT is “one of these shadowy dark money groups,” noting that the group is not required to disclose its donors.

The group included California Senator Kamala Harris in its complaint as well, accusing her of fundraising off her vote to decline Kavanaugh a Supreme Court seat.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More

Political Theatrics

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including all you whippersnappers under the age of 50), I’m writing this from somewhere over the Atlantic. At least I hope that’s ... Read More