Politics & Policy

Pro-Life Group Sends Cease-and-Desist Letters to YouTube, Pinterest Alleging Censorship

One of the nation’s leading pro-life organizations is fighting YouTube and Pinterest over alleged discrimination against the group’s anti-abortion posts on both platforms.

The group, Live Action, announced Friday that its attorneys had sent cease and-desist letters to YouTube and Pinterest dated August 21, demanding the platforms address its allegations or contact its lawyers by August 30.

Live Action has accused YouTube of failing to publish its video ads, breach of contract, and causing it to suffer financial losses. Pinterest banned Live Action from its platform in June, claiming its “pro-life educational and political content” qualified as “pornographic.” Live Action’s lawyers wrote in their letter that the decision smacked of “kneejerk reactions and poorly thought-out pretexts for speech suppression.”

YouTube has said it is looking into the concerns raised by Live Action. Pinterest has not replied to the group’s letter.

“Litigation is likely to ensue in this matter,” the letters read.

“It is truly sad and disheartening that in a society built on the principles of freedom of speech and assembly companies like YouTube and Pinterest, who clearly benefit from these first principles of American culture, are engaging in not-so-subtle tactics to suppress speech with which they disagree,” Lila Rose, Live Action’s founder and president said in a statement. “We have played by the rules outlined by these enterprises, paid our bills and lived up to the terms of service agreements, yet they still choose to discriminate against us because we are a pro-life advocacy organization.”

“YouTube and Pinterest are clearly in violation of the law and must remedy this situation,” said Live Action’s attorney, Harmeet Dhillon of the Dhillon Law Group. “The evidence in both of these cases is substantial, ranging from suppression of speech and breach of contract to censorship and banning of Live Action based on false claims.”

Last week, Live Action made a similar accusation against Facebook, saying the mammoth social-media platform’s fact-checking mechanism labeled as “false” and “inaccurate” the group’s claim that “abortion is never medically necessary.”

“Continued efforts to censor Live Action will have tremendous implications, not only for the pro-life movement, but for free speech in America,” Rose said.

Most Popular


How States Like Virginia Go Blue

So this is what it feels like to live in a lab experiment. As a native Virginian, I’ve watched my state come full circle. The last time Democrats enjoyed the amount of power in the Old Dominion that they won on Tuesday, I was entering middle school in Fairfax County. In 1993 the governor was a Democrat, one ... Read More
Books, Arts & Manners

Why Study Latin?

Oxford professor Nicola Gardini urges people to read and study Latin. He believes that Latin is the antidote for the modern age, which seems transfixed by the spontaneous, the easy, and the ephemeral. His new book, Long Live Latin: The Pleasures of a Useless Language, argues that Latin combines truth and ... Read More

Religious-Freedom Voters Will Vote Trump

The late Supreme Court Justice Frank Murphy wrote, "Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion all have a double aspect — freedom of thought and freedom of action.” To which one should be able to add, freedom of inaction -- meaning that absent a compelling state interest, people should ... Read More

Democratic Denial

One point I'd draw out from David Harsanyi's post below: It has been more than thirty years since a Democratic presidential nominee failed to make it to the White House and thought the loss was legitimate. Read More