News

Health Care

Pro-life Groups Call for Removal of NIH Chief Over Fetal Tissue Research

Director of the National Institutes of Health, Francis Collins. (Wikimedia Commons)

Several national pro-life groups are calling for the removal of the National Institutes of Health director after he recently expressed support for fetal-tissue research.

Live Action, the March for Life, the Family Research Council, and other groups have called for NIH Director Francis Collins to be fired after he defended the government’s medical research using fetal matter donated by women who have had abortions, an issue that has saddened pro-life Americans and galvanized their opposition.

“There is strong evidence that scientific benefits can come from fetal tissue research, which can be done with an ethical framework,” Collins said last week at a meeting of NIH’s Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD) in Bethesda, Maryland.

He added that an ongoing review of the research will hopefully “assure the skeptics” of its benefits.

“Collins’ actions are inconsistent with the pro-life policies of this administration. It is time for his departure,” said March for Life president Jeanne Mancini, a veteran of HHS during George W. Bush’s tenure.

Collins’ replacement should be “someone who recognizes that children who are killed by abortion should be mourned, not experimented on,” agreed Live Action President Lila Rose.

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins called the NIH director’s comments “more reflective of the previous administration rather than the Trump administration, which has consistently advanced the sanctity of human life.”

“Tax dollars are contributing to an industry that fosters the trafficking of body parts from aborted children,” Perkins said.

The Department of Health and Human Services in September announced a “comprehensive review of all research involving fetal tissue to ensure consistency with statutes and regulations,” citing “serious regulatory, moral, and ethical considerations” and promised to look for alternatives.

The Trump administration halted fetal tissue purchases by researchers at the FDA and NIH and is reviewing agreements with outside contractors while the HHS review is in progress. HHS has allotted $20 million to search for alternative research methods.

Fetal-tissue research is used to search for cures for HIV and cancer, among other things.

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More
World

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More
U.S.

Supreme Court Mulls Citizenship Question for Census

Washington -- The oral arguments the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday will be more decorous than the gusts of judicial testiness that blew the case up to the nation’s highest tribunal. The case, which raises arcane questions of administrative law but could have widely radiating political and policy ... Read More