News

Law & the Courts

‘C’Mon Man’ — Judge in Manafort Case Accuses Mueller’s Team of ‘Lying’

The federal judge presiding over Paul Manafort’s tax- and bank-fraud case chastised attorneys representing Special Counsel Robert Mueller Friday for misrepresenting the aim of their investigation and overstepping their authority in bringing fraud charges against the former Trump campaign chairman.

During the hearing, U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis pressed Michael Dreeben, the attorney representing Mueller’s team, to explain where the special counsel derived the authority to prosecute Manafort for decade-old financial crimes.

“I don’t see what relationship this indictment has with anything the special counsel is authorized to investigate,” Ellis said.

Dreeben reportedly argued that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein provided them broad authority to pursue any criminal activity they discovered in the course of investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Ellis was unconvinced, pointing out that some of the relevant information in Manafort’s case came from an earlier Department of Justice investigation, not the special counsel’s probe, according to Fox News.

The judge then proceeded to summarize the prosecution’s case: “We said this was what the investigation was about but we are not bound by it and we were lying,” he said. “C’mon Man!”

In a fortuitous turn of events for the defense team, Ellis went on to question the prosecution’s entire motivation in bringing tax- and bank-fraud charges against Manafort.

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort….What you really care about is what information Mr. Manafort could give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump or lead to his prosecution, or impeachment, or whatever,” Ellis said.

In addition to the tax- and bank-fraud charges Manafort is facing in Virginia, he is also dealing with charges of money laundering and failing to register as a foreign lobbyist in a separate D.C. court. The charges are related to lobbying work he did in Ukraine before going to work for the Trump campaign.

Manfort’s attorneys asked Ellis to dismiss a criminal indictment against him Friday, citing the special counsel’s dubious authority.

Ellis suggested the case should be brought by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Virginia rather than the special counsel and asked the special counsel’s office to provide him a copy of Rosenstein’s memo outlining its mandate.

Most Popular

Culture

White Cats and Black Swans

Making a film of Cats is a bold endeavor — it is a musical with no real plot, based on T. S. Eliot’s idea of child-appropriate poems, and old Tom was a strange cat indeed. Casting Idris Elba as the criminal cat Macavity seems almost inevitable — he has always made a great gangster — but I think there was ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Other Case against Reparations

Reparations are an ethical disaster. Proceeding from a doctrine of collective guilt, they are the penalty for slavery and Jim Crow, sins of which few living Americans stand accused. An offense against common sense as well as morality, reparations would take from Bubba and give to Barack, never mind if the former ... Read More
Politics & Policy

May I See Your ID?

Identity is big these days, and probably all days: racial identity, ethnic identity, political identity, etc. Tribalism. It seems to be baked into the human cake. Only the consciously, persistently religious, or spiritual, transcend it, I suppose. (“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor ... Read More
Health Care

The Puzzling Problem of Vaping

San Francisco -- A 29-story office building at 123 Mission Street illustrates the policy puzzles that fester because of these facts: For centuries, tobacco has been a widely used, legal consumer good that does serious and often lethal harm when used as it is intended to be used. And its harmfulness has been a ... Read More