News

Law & the Courts

SCOTUS Declines to Dismiss Charges against Pro-Life Activists

The Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., June 11, 2018. (Erin Schaff/Reuters)

The Supreme Court dealt a blow to the pro-life Center for Medical Progress Monday, declining to hear its request to throw out a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood.

At issue in the case is CMP’s 2015 recording of undercover footage of abortion clinics and clinic employees, which was designed to show that the nation’s largest abortion provider was illegally profiting from the sale of fetal body parts. Planned Parenthood sued CMP in 2016, accusing the group of violating federal conspiracy and wiretapping laws as well as fraudulently obtaining access to Planned Parenthood facilities.

Planned Parenthood has vehemently denied that it illegally profited from the transfer of fetal tissue to medical researchers and has accused CMP of editing the videos deceptively to imply wrongdoing. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stated in a January ruling that the videos are “authentic and not deceptively edited.”

CMP, led by activist David Daleiden, has argued that its filming of abortion providers was protected under the First Amendment, and that Planned Parenthood’s suit violates “anti-SLAPP” laws, which are meant protect against lawsuits that attempt to shut down free speech on a public issue.

The high court on Monday declined to hear CMP’s request to appeal a ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which let Planned Parenthood’s charges against them proceed.

The undercover videos, which purported to show executives from Planned Parenthood and other organizations haggling over compensation for the transfer and preservation of fetal parts, sparked three congressional inquiries and criminal investigations in over a dozen states.

Last year, the Supreme Court also let stand a ruling from the 9th Circuit denying the release of additional videos, saying there was no criminal activity evident in the footage.

Most Popular

White House

Out of Order

A  question in the spirit of Donald Trump’s tweets this morning might be: Who’s trying harder to crash U.S. markets, the president of the United States or the president of China? After Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell didn’t forecast the loosening of monetary policy that Trump craves and China ... Read More
Film & TV

Netflix Debuts Its Obama Manifesto

This week’s widespread media blitz heralding Netflix’s broadcast of its first Obama-endorsed presentation, American Factory, was more than synchronicity. It felt as though U.S. publicists and journalists collectively exhaled their relief at finally regaining the bully pulpit. Reviews of American Factory, a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Capital versus Tucker Carlson

Advertisers do not advertise on Tucker Carlson’s show to endorse the views of Tucker Carlson. They advertise on his show for the same reason they advertise elsewhere: a captive audience — in Tucker’s case, the second-largest one in cable news — might spare thirty seconds of attention that will, they hope, ... Read More
Natural Law

Are Your Sexual Preferences Transphobic?

Last year, a study exploring “transgender exclusion from the world of dating” was published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Of nearly 1,000 participants, the overwhelming majority, 87.5 percent, irrespective of their sexual preference, said they would not consider dating a trans person, ... Read More