Law & the Courts

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Citizenship Census Question

The Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., June 11, 2018. (Erin Schaff/Reuters)

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to rule on whether the Trump administration can include a question about citizenship on the 2020 national census.

In deciding to hear the case, the Supreme Court took the unusual step of intervening before any appeals court had ruled on the matter. Arguments are scheduled for April, so the case should be resolved before the next census is distributed in June.

Citing a December 2017 request from the Department of Justice, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross ordered the citizenship question to be included in the upcoming census for the first time in nearly 70 years on the grounds that it would help with enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. A federal judge in Manhattan ruled against the administration last month and questioned Ross’s intent in introducing the question.

“While the court is unable to determine — based on the existing record, at least — what Secretary Ross’s real reasons for adding the citizenship question were, it does find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that promoting enforcement of the [Voting Rights Act] was his real reason for the decision,” Judge Jesse Furman of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan wrote. “Instead, the court finds that the V.R.A. was a post hoc rationale for a decision that the secretary had already made for other reasons.”

Critics of the citizenship question argue that it will negatively impact the accuracy of the census as many illegal immigrants will be fearful the information will be used against them. The administration, however, has maintained that the question will help protect against voter fraud.

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?

If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.


Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More

Australia’s Voters Reject Leftist Ideas

Hell hath no fury greater than left-wingers who lose an election in a surprise upset. Think Brexit in 2016. Think Trump’s victory the same year. Now add Australia. Conservative prime minister Scott Morrison shocked pollsters and pundits alike with his victory on Saturday, and the reaction has been brutal ... Read More