News

Law & the Courts

Supreme Court to Hear Petition on Trump Financial Records

(Brendan McDermid/Reuters)

The Supreme Court announced on Friday that it will hear President Trump’s petition to prevent the release of his financial records.

During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump pledged to release his financial records if he took office. But since then he has refused to make good on his pledge, leading his opponents to seek the records in court.

House Democrats have tried to force Trump to release the records through various lawsuits, so far without success. Meanwhile, Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance has been attempting to gain access to the records from Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars LLP, for an investigation into the Trump campaign’s hush-money payments to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels. Daniels has repeatedly alleged that she had an affair with Trump, which the president denies.

The Supreme Court will rule on three cases simultaneously: Vance’s and two other Democrat-initiated petitions of Mazars and Deutsche Bank (the largest lender to the Trump Organization) to release the president’s financial records.

“The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument,” the Court announced. “The cases will be set for argument in the March 2020 argument session.” Trump’s legal team reacted favorably to the decision.

“We are pleased that the Supreme Court has taken up these three cases of significant constitutional issues,” Trump attorney Jay Sekulow told ABC. “We look forward to presenting written and oral arguments.”

In its original appeal to the Court, Trump’s legal team argued that the cases touch on various constitutional issues regarding the separation of powers in government. The Court’s decision on the cases is expected sometime in June of next year.

Zachary Evans is a news writer for National Review Online. He is a veteran of the Israeli Defense Forces and a trained violist.

Most Popular

White House

The Democrats’ Burisma Bait and Switch

Imagine you get indicted in a swindle. The prosecutors represent that they can prove you and your alleged co-conspirators planned to fleece a major financial institution. You counter that you weren’t fleecing anyone. Sure, you were asking for millions in loans, but the collateral you were prepared to post was ... Read More
White House

The Democrats’ Burisma Bait and Switch

Imagine you get indicted in a swindle. The prosecutors represent that they can prove you and your alleged co-conspirators planned to fleece a major financial institution. You counter that you weren’t fleecing anyone. Sure, you were asking for millions in loans, but the collateral you were prepared to post was ... Read More

A Nation of Barbers

It seems almost inevitable that long hair is unwelcome at Barbers Hill High School. There’s a touch of aptronymic poetry in Texas public-school dress-code disputes. When I was in school in the 1980s, at the height of the Satanism panic, the local school-district superintendent circulated a list of ... Read More

A Nation of Barbers

It seems almost inevitable that long hair is unwelcome at Barbers Hill High School. There’s a touch of aptronymic poetry in Texas public-school dress-code disputes. When I was in school in the 1980s, at the height of the Satanism panic, the local school-district superintendent circulated a list of ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The March for Life Is a March for Truth

Pro-lifers are marching today, as they do every year, to commemorate a great evil that was done in January 1973 and to express solidarity with its innocent victims. The Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade eliminated legal protections for unborn children in all 50 states, and did so without any ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The March for Life Is a March for Truth

Pro-lifers are marching today, as they do every year, to commemorate a great evil that was done in January 1973 and to express solidarity with its innocent victims. The Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade eliminated legal protections for unborn children in all 50 states, and did so without any ... Read More
Politics & Policy

15 Flaws in Adam Schiff’s Case

Adam Schiff did most of the heavy lifting for the House managers, and if he performed ably, he also relied on arguments and tropes that don’t withstand scrutiny. The Democratic case for impeachment and removal is now heavily encrusted with clichés, widely accepted by the media, meant to give their ... Read More
Politics & Policy

15 Flaws in Adam Schiff’s Case

Adam Schiff did most of the heavy lifting for the House managers, and if he performed ably, he also relied on arguments and tropes that don’t withstand scrutiny. The Democratic case for impeachment and removal is now heavily encrusted with clichés, widely accepted by the media, meant to give their ... Read More