Theresa May to Face Vote of No Confidence

Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May listens to the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, at the start of their meeting at 10 Downing Street, London, Britain, July 24, 2018. (Matt Dunham/Pool via Reuters)

Embattled British prime minister Theresa May will face a vote of no confidence Wednesday as a number of her fellow Tory MPs, angered by her handling of Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union, seek to unseat her.

Graham Brady, chairman of the backbench 1922 committee of Conservative lawmakers, said Wednesday that he had reached the threshold required to hold a no-confidence vote after receiving letters from 48 members, or 15 percent, of the conservative Tory party objecting to May’s continued leadership. Should May lose the confidence of her party, she would be replaced as Tory leader and her successor would take over as prime minister.

The no-confidence vote comes after May postponed a vote in the House of Commons on the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, previously scheduled for Tuesday, after realizing she lacked the votes to pass it.

The agreement May stewarded over the past two years has encountered stiff opposition from her fellow conservatives, many of whom strenuously object to a provision in the agreement that requires Britain to remain in compliance with E.U. customs rules. That provision, which can only be vacated with the consent of the E.U., is necessary in order to prevent the closure of the Northern Irish border.

Speaking outside 10 Downing Street Wednesday morning, May vowed to “contest that vote with everything I’ve got.”

“A change in leadership in the Conservative Party now will put our country at risk and create uncertainty when we can least afford it,” she added. “Weeks spent tearing ourselves apart would only create more division, when we should be standing together.”

Should May secure the backing of 158 of the 300 conservative MPs, she will retain her leadership of the Tory party and her critics will be unable to challenge her leadership again for one year.

There is no plan currently in place to manage Britain’s March 29 withdrawal from the European Union — a state of affairs that, if left unremedied, will likely result in massive political and economic disruption.

Most Popular

Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More