News

White House

Top Dem Congressman Says Hush Payments May Be ‘Impeachable Offenses’

Representative Jerrold Nadler (D, N.Y.) and Judy Chu (D, Calif.) hold a news conference in Washington, D.C., September 14, 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuteres)

A top House Democrat said Sunday that President Trump could be impeached if he directed his lawyer to make illegal hush payments to women claiming to have had affairs with the then-presidential candidate.

“They would be impeachable offenses. Whether they’re important enough to justify an impeachment is a different question,” said Representative Jerry Nadler on CNN.

“Certainly, they’re impeachable offenses, because, even though they were committed before the president became president, they were committed in the service of fraudulently obtaining the office,” the New York Democrat said.

On Friday, federal prosecutors at the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office wrote in a sentencing memo for Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal lawyer and fixer, that, “as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1,” Individual-1 referring to Trump.

Cohen pled guilty in August to eight federal counts, including making false statements to a bank, tax fraud, and campaign finance violations related to the Trump campaign, but so far Trump has not been implicated in directing any illegal activity.

Nadler, who will be chairman of the House Judiciary Committee in the next Congress, where Democrats will control the majority, cautioned that an impeachable offense doesn’t guarantee there will be an impeachment.

“You don’t necessarily launch an impeachment against the President because he committed an impeachable offense,” he said.

“There are several things you have to look at. One, were there impeachable offenses committed? How many? And secondly, how important were they? Did they rise to the gravity where you should undertake an impeachment?” he said. “An impeachment is an attempt to affect or overturn the result of the last election and should do it only for very serious situations.”

Last month, the congressman warned against a hasty impeachment, saying a “partisan impeachment” would tear the country apart and might not be worth it.

“You have to be reluctant to do an impeachment,” he said on MSNBC. “You don’t want half the country to say to the other half for the next 30 years, ‘We won the election. You stole it from us.'”

Most Popular

Elections

Lying Liz

Ever since she began explaining how her Medicare for all plan would be funded, and how she would pass it, Elizabeth Warren has been sinking. Ahead of last week’s debate, her camp leaked a story that her friend Bernie Sanders met with her in 2018 to discuss plans for 2020, and that at this meeting, Sanders had ... Read More
Elections

Lying Liz

Ever since she began explaining how her Medicare for all plan would be funded, and how she would pass it, Elizabeth Warren has been sinking. Ahead of last week’s debate, her camp leaked a story that her friend Bernie Sanders met with her in 2018 to discuss plans for 2020, and that at this meeting, Sanders had ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Botched Democratic Case for Witnesses

The fate of the republic, we are now supposed to believe, hinges on whether there are witnesses at a Senate impeachment trial. Upon the long-anticipated transmittal of the articles of impeachment to the Senate, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said if the upper chamber doesn’t obtain the witnesses and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Botched Democratic Case for Witnesses

The fate of the republic, we are now supposed to believe, hinges on whether there are witnesses at a Senate impeachment trial. Upon the long-anticipated transmittal of the articles of impeachment to the Senate, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said if the upper chamber doesn’t obtain the witnesses and ... Read More