News

Immigration

Trump Administration Urges Supreme Court to Take up DACA Case Immediately

DACA supporters outside the White House, September 2017. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

The Trump administration has requested once again that the Supreme Court rule on the legality of the administration’s attempt to discontinue the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program before a lower court rules on the matter.

Solicitor General Noel Francisco announced Monday evening that the Department of Justice filed a legal request, known as a writ of certiorari, asking that the Supreme Court take up the case to prevent the issue from remaining unresolved for the coming year.

Should the Supreme Court refuse his request, Francisco pointed out, the administration would be required to continue accepting DACA applications while waiting on California’s ninth circuit to rule on the legality of ending the program.

“Absent prompt intervention from this court, there is little chance the court would resolve this dispute for at least another year,” Francisco wrote in a letter to the Supreme Court.

The request comes after the Supreme Court rejected a similar plea in February.

The DACA program provides temporary amnesty on a renewable two-year basis to immigrants brought to the country illegally by their parents while under the age of 16, provided they arrived before 2007. To date, the program has shielded some 700,000 immigrants from deportation.

The administration’s attempt to end the program last year was rejected by multiple federal courts and the Department of Homeland Security was ordered to continue accepting renewal applications while the case is adjudicated.

The case has been before the ninth circuit in San Francisco for six months and the court takes an average of 23 months to issue a final ruling. The Supreme Court’s arguments calendar usually fills up by mid-January, so, unless the ninth circuit issues an expedited ruling, it’s unlikely the administration would have the opportunity to challenge the ruling before the High Court before next year.

Jack Crowe — Jack Crowe is a news writer at National Review Online.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Inquisitor Has No Clothes

This is a column about impeachment, but first, a confession: I think I might be guilty of insider trading. At this point, I would like to assure my dear friends at the SEC that I do not mean this in any actionable legal sense, but only in principle. Some time ago, I was considering making an investment in a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Shaming Women Who Vote Right

Some progressives have decided that rather than convincing women that their candidates and policy proposals are better than those of conservatives, they will shame women who fail to vote for the Left by defining them all as racist and self-loathing tools of the patriarchy. Think I’m exaggerating? See this ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Way Forward from the Midterms

With the 2018 midterm elections now in the rearview mirror, Republicans have been awakened to a simple fact: The laws of political gravity apply to President Trump. Democrats won sweeping victories in the House, kept their Senate losses to a near-minimum despite a brutal map, and took down-ballot races with ... Read More