News

White House

Ukraine Whistleblower’s Legal Team Preparing for Possible Public Testimony in Senate

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, Sept. 25, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

The legal team for the whistleblower whose complaint sparked the impeachment inquiry into President Trump is trying to develop a strategy to counter a possible subpoena for public testimony, in the likely event the Senate conducts an impeachment trial, CNN reported on Wednesday.

The whistleblower’s complaint pertained to a phone call made by President Trump on July 25, during which Trump urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate corruption allegations against political rival Joe Biden. House Democrats have since launched the impeachment inquiry due to suspicions Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine to pressure the country to investigate Biden.

Senators could subpoena the whistleblower to publicly testify in an impeachment trial. President Trump and allies have repeatedly urged the whistleblower to come forward publicly, however he or she has only offered to answer written questions from Republicans.

The whistleblower’s legal team is looking into what case it can make to prevent him or her from testifying, and is conducting research into historical precedent to build an argument.

However, it is still not clear what form the expected trial will take. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has suggested a scenario in which no trial even occurs, although he has not yet made a decision on the matter.

“The House managers would come over and make their argument. The President’s lawyers would then respond. And at that point, the Senate has two choices: It could go down the path of calling witnesses and basically having another trial,” McConnell told reporters on Tuesday. “Or it could decide — and again, 51 senators could make that decision — that they’ve heard enough and believe they know what would happen and could move on the two articles of impeachment sent over to us from the House.”

Meanwhile, several moderate Democrats from swing districts are worried an impeachment vote will put them at a disadvantage in the 2020 elections. Some have raised the idea of censuring Trump over his actions regarding Ukraine instead of impeaching him, but the idea does not have broad support in the House.

Zachary Evans is a news writer for National Review Online. He is a veteran of the Israeli Defense Forces and a trained violist.

Most Popular

White House

The Hole in the Impeachment Case

Thought experiment No. 1: Suppose Bob Mueller’s probe actually proves that Donald Trump is under Vladimir Putin’s thumb. Fill in the rest of the blanks with your favorite corruption fantasy: The Kremlin has video of the mogul-turned-president debauching himself in a Moscow hotel; the Kremlin has a bulging ... Read More
White House

The Hole in the Impeachment Case

Thought experiment No. 1: Suppose Bob Mueller’s probe actually proves that Donald Trump is under Vladimir Putin’s thumb. Fill in the rest of the blanks with your favorite corruption fantasy: The Kremlin has video of the mogul-turned-president debauching himself in a Moscow hotel; the Kremlin has a bulging ... Read More
Media

Martha McSally’s Blasphemy

As I note in my New York Post piece today, I don’t believe that Martha McSally, who is serving her first term in the Senate after being appointed to take John McCain’s seat, is going to be helped much by accusing CNN’s Manu Raju of being a “hack.” Attacking the press might be an effective way to excite ... Read More
Media

Martha McSally’s Blasphemy

As I note in my New York Post piece today, I don’t believe that Martha McSally, who is serving her first term in the Senate after being appointed to take John McCain’s seat, is going to be helped much by accusing CNN’s Manu Raju of being a “hack.” Attacking the press might be an effective way to excite ... Read More
Elections

Thanks for Nothing, New York Times

Imagine how self-important you’d have to be as an institution to decide that the public so craves your political advice and opinion that you need to air an hour-long program dedicated to sharing your painstaking deliberations over who ought to be the Democratic presidential nominee. Next, imagine you’re so ... Read More
Elections

Thanks for Nothing, New York Times

Imagine how self-important you’d have to be as an institution to decide that the public so craves your political advice and opinion that you need to air an hour-long program dedicated to sharing your painstaking deliberations over who ought to be the Democratic presidential nominee. Next, imagine you’re so ... Read More