News

U.S.

Washington Monthly Retracts ‘Neo-Nazi’ Slur of Fred Fleitz

Fred Fleitz at CPAC 2016 (Gage Skidmore)

The Washington Monthly has retracted a scurrilous headline that claimed the National Security Council’s new chief of staff is a neo-Nazi.

The article alleged former CIA analyst Fred Fleitz espoused Neo-Nazi views, but later the publication issued this correction:

“An earlier version of this post ran under the headline ‘Bolton Taps Neo-Nazi as National Security Council Chief of Staff.’ While there are links between the Center for Security Policy and neo-Nazi organizations in Europe, it was wrong to imply that there is evidence that Fred Fleitz is personally a neo-Nazi. We regret the mistake.”

The headline was changed to read, “John Bolton’s New Chief of Staff Has Deeply Alarming Connections.”

The article cites Fleitz’s former position as senior vice president for policy at the conservative Center for Security Policy, saying the organization has ties to far-right movements in Europe, although it “recommends double-checking” the sources used to connect them.

The story also calls Fleitz, an opponent of the Iran nuclear deal, a “raving Islamophobe,” again citing his ties to CSP, which the left-leaning Southern Poverty Law Center has branded a hate group and “conspiracy-oriented mouthpiece for the growing anti-Muslim movement.”

“Many of the attacks originated from the left Southern Poverty Law Center, which in recent years has raised money by putting out press releases or statements falsely grouping conservative Americans with neo-Nazis and white supremacists,” a senior NSC official told The Washington Times.

National Security Advisor John Bolton tapped Fleitz as NSC chief of staff, and he assumed his position this week.

Fleitz was also chief of staff to Bolton from 2001 to 2005 when Bolton was an undersecretary of state for arms control at the State Department.

Send a tip to the news team at NR.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Judge Barrett on the Second Amendment

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s impressive dissent in Kanter v. Barr (pp. 27-64) illustrates both her fidelity to the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and her masterful application of the constitutional methodology of originalism. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Judge Barrett on the Second Amendment

Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s impressive dissent in Kanter v. Barr (pp. 27-64) illustrates both her fidelity to the Supreme Court’s landmark Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and her masterful application of the constitutional methodology of originalism. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Do You Want 51 or 52 States Next Year?

“The prospects of statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., have never been greater, but many significant obstacles loom,” The Hill declares. The Constitution declares, “new States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction ... Read More
Elections

There Will Be a Peaceful Transfer of Power

The answer to the question, “Will your administration oversee a peaceful transfer of power after the impending election?” is, without exception, “Yes.” It would be better for the United States, and for this administration, if President Trump understood that. One of the more peculiar political dynamics ... Read More
Elections

There Will Be a Peaceful Transfer of Power

The answer to the question, “Will your administration oversee a peaceful transfer of power after the impending election?” is, without exception, “Yes.” It would be better for the United States, and for this administration, if President Trump understood that. One of the more peculiar political dynamics ... Read More
Law & the Courts

No, the Democrats Won’t Pack the Court

For many progressive opinion-makers, the only way to save the Supreme Court is to destroy it.   They believe the best response to the Republican-held Senate confirming a Trump nominee to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the Supreme Court is to pack the Court if Democrats win in November. Holding out the ... Read More
Law & the Courts

No, the Democrats Won’t Pack the Court

For many progressive opinion-makers, the only way to save the Supreme Court is to destroy it.   They believe the best response to the Republican-held Senate confirming a Trump nominee to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the Supreme Court is to pack the Court if Democrats win in November. Holding out the ... Read More