National Review / Digital
The Unions’ Last Stand?
California’s Proposition 32 could be pivotal


Los Angeles — After the presidential election, the most consequential political contest in America this year is that over Proposition 32, a California ballot initiative that would curb union political power. If voters approve it in November, it could follow in the footsteps of 1978’s Proposition 13, a tax-cutting initiative that spread nationwide and remade the political landscape.

Proposition 32, in essence, would forbid unions — both public- and private-sector — to automatically deduct money from their members’ paychecks to finance political activities. They could still collect dues for administrative and collective-bargaining expenses, but if they wanted to spend money on political activities, they would have to solicit voluntary contributions.

Nationwide, unions collect some $14 billion a year in dues, more than half of which comes from government employees. “That’s more revenues than 65 percent of the Fortune 500 companies, giving unions huge money to spend on politics — almost all of which goes to Democrats,” writes Mallory Factor in his new book, Shadowbosses: Government Unions Control America and Rob Taxpayers Blind.

Many believe that America’s unions are losing clout, but that isn’t true when public-sector unions are taken into account. Yes, membership in private-sector unions has dropped from 35 percent of the private work force in the 1950s to just 7 percent today. But in the public sector, union membership exploded during the Sixties and Seventies as collective-bargaining laws swept through most state legislatures — giving unions monopoly power to represent all workers at a place of employment so long as a majority of workers vote to unionize — and has hit nearly 40 percent of the governmental work force. The percentages for many occupations — teachers, nurses, firefighters, police officers — are much higher. Schoolteachers, for example, are 80 percent unionized, a fact that explains many of the problems in our failing public schools.

No other interest group in America can match the public-employees’ unions in their potent combination of guaranteed dues money, mobilized manpower, and geographic dispersion. Ask former California governors Pete Wilson and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Each placed on the state’s ballot a measure to end the use of mandatory payroll deductions to collect union dues for political purposes, an idea they called “paycheck protection.”

In 1998, the unions spent a tsunami of cash opposing Wilson’s initiative, which lost, 53 percent to 47 percent. But then the unions overreached. That year, they helped elect Democrat Gray Davis, whom they pressured to adopt a raft of pro-union measures that hurt the state’s business climate. “I think that one of the reasons Gray Davis was recalled in 2003 was his cave-ins to unions,” Jon Coupal of the Sacramento-based Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association told me back then. “He accepted a $500,000 contribution from the prison guards’ union immediately before he signed a bill massively increasing their benefits. The union leader actually made the quid pro quo public by essentially saying that ‘yes, he gave us the benefits because we paid him the money.’”

After his victory in the recall election, Governor Schwarzenegger resurrected Wilson’s ballot initiative to end automatic dues deduction, a move he said would “break the stranglehold unions have over the legislature and the budget.” But he too was outspent, and his measure went down by the same margin: 53 percent to 47 percent.

This year, the backers of Proposition 32 hope to ride a wave of anger over public-employee pensions. Until recently, police officers in San Francisco could retire in their 50s and receive a pension amounting to 90 percent of their last year’s salary, while most private-sector workers — who on average earn less than public employees — have no employer-provided retirement benefits but must pay taxes to support the public pensions. That helps explain why citizens of both San Diego and San Jose — cities that gave Barack Obama more than 60 percent of their ballots in 2008 — voted by more than two to one last June to curb public-employee pensions.

Unlike its two predecessor initiatives, Proposition 32 prohibits both unions and corporations from using paycheck deductions for politics or contributing directly or indirectly to candidates. It also limits the political contributions that government contractors may make to elected officials.

Why are the unions and their liberal allies so desperate to block such reforms? It’s all about the money. Unions can’t abide the loss of political clout that will result from ending the state’s practice of automatically deducting union dues. For most California public employees, union dues total between $800 and $1,200 a year, much of which is funneled into political spending to elect the officials who negotiate their contracts. In other words, the unions are often represented on both sides of the bargaining table.

October 29, 2012    |     Volume LXIV, No. 20

  • Dinesh D’Souza has scored a hit, controversially.
  • Progressive law schools and the crisis of constitutionalism.
Books, Arts & Manners
  • Jason Lee Steorts reviews Brigham Young: Pioneer Prophet, by John G. Turner.
  • Samuel R. Staley reviews Spreading the Wealth: How Obama Is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities, by Stanley Kurtz.
  • Ronald Radosh reviews The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor, by Paul Kengor.
  • Robert VerBruggen reviews The Victims’ Revolution: The Rise of Identity Studies and the Closing of the Liberal Mind, by Bruce Bawer.
  • Ross Douthat reviews The Master.
  • Kyle Smith reviews the 1962 film Lawrence of Arabia.
The Long View  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  
Athwart  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  
Poetry  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  
Happy Warrior  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .