Phi Beta Cons

FAIR Follies

While I know that few serious people believe that academic opposition to military recruiting is actually motivated by diversity concerns, it remains consistently necessary to pound away at leftist rhetoric with, well, actual facts. For the last several years (and certainly while the ridiculous FAIR lawsuit was winding its way through the federal system), we’ve seen the academic left self-righteously deny that this opposition is anything less than patriotic or motivated by anything less than a concern for legal equality and fundamental fairness. The issue is diversity, the academics argue, not patriotism. 
Well now I have experienced both the academy and the military, and the military wins the diversity contest hands down. I attended law school at Harvard and taught at Cornell Law School, and both places were ideological, geographical, and racial monocultures compared to my JAG class. It almost goes without saying that the military is far more ideologically diverse than an Ivy League university (almost any institution is more ideologically diverse than Harvard). The diversity in my own unit was such that ideological assumptions were dangerous. In fact, as a social and economic conservative, I found myself decisively outnumbered by my more liberal colleagues.
Nor was the diversity limited to the world of ideas. My own eight-person squad featured a couple of good ‘ol southern boys, attorneys from California and Ohio, a judge from Boston, and immigrants from Taiwan, Korea, and Venezuela. Collectively, we represented four different native countries and four different native languages.  While my experience is admittedly limited (I am merely at the beginning of my military journey), it seems that it is not the military that is increasingly removed from American culture and the American experience but instead the academy (and its cultural allies in the media). 
During the Clinton administration, there was much talk of a cabinet (and government) that “looked like America.”  Our military does look like America, and it is plain that the academy does not like what it sees. So . . . is their real problem with our military, or our nation? 

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular


G-File Mailbag: The Results of a Bad Idea

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you just standing there eating Zarg nuts), I had a bad idea. It wasn’t a terrible idea, like asking a meth addict ... Read More
Politics & Policy

How Democrats Can Blow It in 2020

Donald Trump probably can’t win the 2020 presidential election, but the Democrats can lose it. What I mean is that in a contest between Trump and a generic Democrat, Trump would almost surely lose if the current political climate holds through 2020. According to a Fox News poll this week, 38 percent of ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Collusion Scenario

It has become an article of faith in some quarters on the right -- well, most -- that the Mueller investigation has found no evidence of collusion with Russia and has accordingly shifted gears to process crimes like lying to the FBI or obstruction of justice. Having decided that this must be true, many have ... Read More

Democrats’ Border-Barrier Flip-Flop

Is steel more moral than concrete? House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California said last week that she and other Democrats consider a border wall “immoral.” But some of the same Democrats who decry President Donald J. Trump’s proposed concrete wall as a 30-foot-tall human-rights violation actually ... Read More