Phi Beta Cons

Economics Needs More Historical Context

As an undergraduate economics major, I took one course on the history of economic thought (it was an elective). During exams, I didn’t use economic models or math equations. I wrote essays explaining the intellectual contributions of, for example, Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes. Bonus points for demonstrating how the ideas of one economist influenced another. Besides that, the only other economic history I received came in an international economics course, when my professor showed us the 2002 PBS documentary The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy.

It turns out that my smattering of economic history puts me ahead of the curve in comparison with many of today’s economics students. In today’s Pope Center feature, Alex Contarino, a rising senior at UNC-Chapel Hill majoring in economics, writes that in recent decades, many undergraduate programs have shifted away from the teaching of economic history. Instead, they’ve focused on teaching models and equations to prepare students for math-intensive graduate school. As a result, context and historical perspective are lost in the mix. 

Contarino says that undergraduate economics majors should be required to take one economic history course. But other key courses, such as Econ 101, should be tweaked to provide a stronger historical focus. Doing so would benefit all of those non-economics majors who take that course to meet general education requirements. “[Non-economics majors] are poorly served during the time it takes to memorize the equation for price elasticity,” writes Contarino. “Instead, a better economics foundation could be built by interpreting excerpts from, say, Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations.”

Read the full article here.

Jesse Saffron — Jesse Saffron is a writer and editor for the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy, a North Carolina-based think tank dedicated to improving higher education in the Tar ...

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More