Phi Beta Cons

How the Department of Education has Made Higher Ed Worse

During recent testimony before a Senate committee, Professor Richard Vedder shocked one of the members, Senator Claire McCaskill, by saying that he favored the elimination of the Department of Education.

Unfortunately, we’ll probably have to put up with the Department for a long time. Democrats go apoplectic when someone suggests that we get rid of it and Republicans mostly roll their eyes because they have no stomach for a fight with the education blob. And it’s too bad that we’ll have to live with it. As Vedder argues in today’s Clarion Call, the Department makes higher education worse.

He starts with some fascinating history. Despite Jimmy Carter’s campaign promise to the NEA to create a Department for it and large Democratic majorities in both chambers, the bill barely passed. There was sensible opposition from such liberal organs as the New York Times.

But the bill passed, Carter signed it, and ever since we’ve endured federal meddling in education, both K-12 and higher. Vedder argues that owing to the Department, higher ed has been damaged: it costs far more, is more elitist, has much lower standards, endures more meddling from the accreditation cartel, suffers from a host of costly and counterproductive regulations, and lures in many students with its “college for everybody” propaganda.

“Summing up,” Vedder writes, “the Department of Education has had, so far as I can see, no positive impact on higher education and has eigther caused or ignored numerous negative effects. Thus it is a tragedy that the skeptics did not prevail back in 1979.”

I agree. Probably the best we can hope for at this point is that the next president will appoint a Secretary of Education who will follow a version of the Hippocratic Oath and at least do no more harm.

George Leef is the the director of editorial content at the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

At the Democratic-primary debate in Houston last night, Beto O’Rourke formally killed off one of the gun-control movement’s favorite taunts: The famous “Nobody is coming for your guns, wingnut.” Asked bluntly whether he was proposing confiscation, O’Rourke abandoned the disingenuous euphemisms that have ... Read More
White House

Politico Doubles Down on Fake Turnberry Scandal

It's tough to be an investigative reporter. Everybody who feeds you a tip has an axe to grind. Or, alternatively, you find yourself going, "I wonder if . . . ?" You put in your research, you talk to lots of people, you accumulate a huge pile of information, but you still haven't proved your hypothesis. A wise ... Read More

Four Cheers for Incandescent Light Bulbs

It brought me much -- indeed, too much -- joy to hear of the Trump administration's rollback of restrictions on incandescent light bulbs, even if the ban will remain in place. The LED bulbs are terrible. They give off a pitiable, dim, and altogether underwhelming "glow," one that never matched the raw (if ... Read More
White House

Rachel Maddow’s Turnberry Tale

To a certain kind of Rachel Maddow viewer, there are few more titillating preludes to a news segment than the one she delivered Monday: “If you have not seen it yet, you are going to want to sit down.” Maddow’s story began, as many of her stories do, with President Trump, this time focused on his hotel ... Read More