Phi Beta Cons

Protectionism in Goods and Protectionism in Ideas

Free trade in goods is unquestionably beneficial, yet we find many people yammering that we’ve got to stop it and instead “protect the country” from bad and unfair foreign competition. Similarly, on college campuses, we find a lot of people who oppose free trade in ideas. They want to silence speakers they disagree with and control the presentation and discussion of ideas that might cause someone to doubt the Approved Set of Beliefs.

In this sharp Heterodox Academy post, April Kelly-Woessner draws the connection between the two phenomena. She writes, “What we see on college campuses are student demands for intellectual trade protection. I argue that protectionism of ideas, like protectionism of goods, is based in insecurity and accomplished through restrictive practices.”

I think that’s correct. The campus authoritarians who insist on disinviting or shouting down speakers they dislike are insecure. Instead of engaging in intellectual competition, they prefer to use coercion. “Insecure people,” she writes, “more easily see others as a threat and perception of threat is a consistent predictor of political intolerance.”

I recommend reading the whole thing.

George Leef — George Leef is the director of research for the John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Yes, There Was FBI Bias

There is much to admire in Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Clinton-emails investigation. Horowitz’s 568-page analysis is comprehensive, fact-intensive, and cautious to a fault. It is also, nonetheless, an incomplete exercise — it omits half ... Read More

Yes, Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted

I know this is ancient history, but — I’m sorry — I just can’t let it go. When historians write the definitive, sordid histories of the 2016 election, the FBI, Hillary, emails, Russia, and Trump, there has to be a collection of chapters making the case that Hillary should have faced a jury ... Read More

Let the World Have Soccer

The United States of America did not qualify for the World Cup this year. Good for us. Soccer is corrupt, hyper-regulated, impoverished by a socialist-style fondness for rationing, and organized to strangle human flourishing. It is so dependent on the whims of referees that is in effect a helpless captive of the ... Read More