Phi Beta Cons

Teaching Important

I’m glad to hear David and Anthony say that the propagandizing in today’s academy is a matter of great concern.  This is a welcome change from years of complacency in which the conservative line was, students see through it and no one is paying attention and it doesn’t matter to the larger society.  As if you could have generation after generation of students imbibing the nihilism of the present-day academy without an its having an effect on the larger society!  I always remember what Solzhenitsyn said about the younger generations of Russia preceding the Revolution and how they grew up mocking everything, setting the stage for what was to follow.  

While we’re praising Mark and his fine new essay, I wanted to mention something from his review of Michael Bérubé’s book that was very insightful.  Bérubé of course tries to argue that today’s academy evinces no liberal bias whatsoever and that the conservative critique is entirely unfair.  As an example, he mentions a student who called a certain essay question un-American just because, as Bérubé sees it, it rose out of criticism of America’s Founding.  Bérubé says, quite rightly, to an extent, that students should certainly be exposed to criticism of their country or else be “miseducated.”  But Mark exposes the liberal bias in the question while also making clear why the liberals are offended at charges of liberal bias.  They genuinely don’t see it because it is as the oxygen they breathe! 
Here is the essay question in question:  ”Analyze the U.S. constitution (original document), and show how its formulation excluded [the] majority of the people living in America at that time, and how it was dominated by America’s elite interest.”
Mark points out that the question is obviously slanted entirely toward the negatives of exploitation and hypocrisy, excludes the possibility of arguing otherwise, and completely bypasses the historic positive achievement of the Founding, the creation of a system of self-government built on natural rights that has served as an expanding model of freedom for so many.  Mark concludes:        

That Bérubé accepts such assignments as straightforward history goes a long way toward explaining why conservative criticisms appear unbalanced or cynical. The liberal outlook, especially regarding race and gender, has seeped into and saturated the curriculum so much that questioning it looks not like a new venture into the marketplace of ideas but like a violation of civility. This makes it almost impossible for conservative reformers in higher education to question, much less alter, the curriculum.  It’s a frustrating impasse. Liberal approaches to the curriculum are so embedded that conservative attacks look suspect on procedural grounds. Say that multiculturalism as commonly practiced is incompatible with the training of erudite students and you offend the other parties. Describe “diversity” as a coercive and illusory term that will be remembered as nothing but a curious example of the mores of the early twenty-first century and you become an unprofessional crank. The substance of your criticism is waylaid by its impropriety.

Still, there seems to be no alternative than to expose the falsehoods in current academic theorizing and to bring out the truth for more and more to see, even if this seems offensive, improper, and uncivil to the liberals.

Most Popular

Liberalism as Faith

The British philosopher John Gray is not someone to shy away from ‘difficult’ topics. If you are looking for a provocative long read this weekend, his new article in the Times Literary Supplement ought to be a contender. I didn’t agree with all of it (for example, I would argue that the supposedly ... Read More

Our Cultural Crisis: A Kirkian Response

Editors’ note: The following article is adapted from a speech the author delivered at the Heritage Foundation on March 14, 2018. Few would dispute that we are in the middle of a grave cultural crisis. A despairing conservative critic wrote: “We are on the road to cultural disaster.” He placed the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

An Enduring Error

Editor’s Note: The following piece originally appeared in City Journal. It is reprinted here with permission. Fifty-one years ago, in July 1967, in response to an explosion of rioting in poor black urban neighborhoods around the United States, President Lyndon B. Johnson created the National Advisory ... Read More

The Mournful, Magnificent Sally Mann

‘Does the earth remember?" The infinitely gifted photographer Sally Mann asks this question in the catalogue of her great retrospective at the National Gallery in Washington. On view there is her series of Civil War battlefield landscapes, among the most ravishing works of art from the early 2000s. Once sites ... Read More

James Comey’s Inadvertent Admission

The good folks at the Republican National Committee awaken and realize that perhaps former FBI agents make more compelling critics of James Comey than, say, Maxine Waters. Yesterday afternoon brought the first excerpts of James Comey’s new book, A Higher Loyalty, and we were expected to run around in ... Read More