Phi Beta Cons

The Tyler Clementi Act and Threats to Free Speech

FIRE has been doing an outstanding job detailing the First Amendment problems presented by the Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act. Simply put, by omitting any requirement that harassing conduct be “objectively offensive,” the Act renders conduct unlawful based on the subjective response of the alleged victim, increasing the danger that students could be guilty of “harassment” if the victim simply feels harassed — regardless of the actual severity of the conduct. The resulting definition of student-on-student harassment is at odds with Supreme Court precedent and with numerous other federal precedents. In short, it creates a federally mandated speech code.

And to what end? It’s hard to see any benefits from the Act. Tyler Clementi was driven to suicide not by mean words, but by actual criminal conduct. The Act would do nothing to further criminalize the unlawful conduct in his case, nor would it have enhanced protections against harassment at his university. Rutgers has long had a speech code more onerous than that required by the Act. In fact, the vast majority of universities — public and private — already have extraordinarily broad speech codes.

 

The Act’s primary effect will be a greater chill on free expression. Students who dissent from the university’s radical sexual orthodoxy will be accused of endangering their classmates’ lives. Already those who defy prevailing norms are labeled as “bigots” or “homophobes” and accused of acts of harassment and hate. If the Act becomes law, campus censors will wield a potent new bureaucratic and rhetorical weapon against the marketplace of ideas. Bullies may not care about speech codes, but law-abiding students do, and they may choose silence rather than risk a trumped-up harassment charge.

 

In the aftermath of tragedy, there is often a desperate call for the government to “do something,” and in Tyler Clementi’s case, it is doing something — prosecuting the offenders under state law.  

David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

Education

An Idea for Student Loans: Get Rid of Them

Here is a three-part plan for something practical the federal government could do to relieve college-loan debt. Step 1: The federal government should stop making college loans itself and cease guaranteeing any such loans. Step 2: It should prohibit educational lending by federally regulated financial institutions ... Read More
Elections

A Reckoning Is in Store for Democrats

The crisis of the Democrats is becoming more evident each week. Those of us who have been loudly predicting for years that the Russian-collusion argument would be exposed as a defamatory farce, and that the authors of it would eventually pay for it, are bemused at the fallback position of the Trump-haters: that ... Read More
White House

MoveOn.GOP?

Some of you will be familiar with a lefty, partisan Democratic organization called MoveOn, formerly MoveOn.Org. It was founded during an investigation into President Bill Clinton’s shenanigans (which were not, Democratic mythology notwithstanding, strictly sexual in nature) and argued that it was time for the ... Read More
Elections

Why ‘Stop Sanders’?

'Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?” T. S. Eliot asked. “Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” And where is the intelligence we have lost in cleverness? Cleverness is the plague of our political classes, an influenza of the intellect. The consultants are always trying to ... Read More