Phi Beta Cons

The Tyler Clementi Act and Threats to Free Speech

FIRE has been doing an outstanding job detailing the First Amendment problems presented by the Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act. Simply put, by omitting any requirement that harassing conduct be “objectively offensive,” the Act renders conduct unlawful based on the subjective response of the alleged victim, increasing the danger that students could be guilty of “harassment” if the victim simply feels harassed — regardless of the actual severity of the conduct. The resulting definition of student-on-student harassment is at odds with Supreme Court precedent and with numerous other federal precedents. In short, it creates a federally mandated speech code.

And to what end? It’s hard to see any benefits from the Act. Tyler Clementi was driven to suicide not by mean words, but by actual criminal conduct. The Act would do nothing to further criminalize the unlawful conduct in his case, nor would it have enhanced protections against harassment at his university. Rutgers has long had a speech code more onerous than that required by the Act. In fact, the vast majority of universities — public and private — already have extraordinarily broad speech codes.

 

The Act’s primary effect will be a greater chill on free expression. Students who dissent from the university’s radical sexual orthodoxy will be accused of endangering their classmates’ lives. Already those who defy prevailing norms are labeled as “bigots” or “homophobes” and accused of acts of harassment and hate. If the Act becomes law, campus censors will wield a potent new bureaucratic and rhetorical weapon against the marketplace of ideas. Bullies may not care about speech codes, but law-abiding students do, and they may choose silence rather than risk a trumped-up harassment charge.

 

In the aftermath of tragedy, there is often a desperate call for the government to “do something,” and in Tyler Clementi’s case, it is doing something — prosecuting the offenders under state law.  

David French — David French is a senior writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Inquisitor Has No Clothes

This is a column about impeachment, but first, a confession: I think I might be guilty of insider trading. At this point, I would like to assure my dear friends at the SEC that I do not mean this in any actionable legal sense, but only in principle. Some time ago, I was considering making an investment in a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Shaming Women Who Vote Right

Some progressives have decided that rather than convincing women that their candidates and policy proposals are better than those of conservatives, they will shame women who fail to vote for the Left by defining them all as racist and self-loathing tools of the patriarchy. Think I’m exaggerating? See this ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Way Forward from the Midterms

With the 2018 midterm elections now in the rearview mirror, Republicans have been awakened to a simple fact: The laws of political gravity apply to President Trump. Democrats won sweeping victories in the House, kept their Senate losses to a near-minimum despite a brutal map, and took down-ballot races with ... Read More