Phi Beta Cons

What Do Judge Walker and Justice Kennedy Have in Common?

They are judicial theologians.

Less than two months ago — as we’ve extensively discussed here on NRO — the Supreme Court ruled that a university with a so-called “all-comers policy” could in fact require a Christian student group to be open to non-Christian leadership and non-Christian voting membership. In other words, a Christian student group could not require that its leaders and voting members agree with the group’s statement of faith. The decisive fifth vote was cast (as it so often is) by Justice Kennedy, who declared, in his concurrence, “The era of the loyalty oath is behind us.”

Make no mistake, this is a theological statement — a theological statement with the force of law. Justice Kennedy injected himself into the very DNA of a private religious organization and declared that the “era” of its statement of faith was over. Private religious organizations recite statements of faith (also commonly known as “creeds”) for theological purposes: to perpetuate belief, to declare truth, to educate children, to affirm faith, and for many, many other reasons. In fact, it is the rare Christian who has not — at one point in their life — stood in their pew and recited the Apostles’ or Nicene creeds. By what possible constitutional standard does a justice of the Supreme Court declare that the era of such statements (and the Christian Legal Society’s own statement of faith is strikingly similar to these historic creeds) is “behind us?”

In yesterday’s Proposition 8 ruling, Judge Walker made his own bold theological statement: “Religious beliefs that gay and lesbian relationships are sinful or inferior heterosexual relationships harm gays and lesbians.” Such a statement presumes, of course, the falsity of such beliefs — a presumption that no federal judge is entitled to make. Moreover, it renders several thousand years of Judeo-Christian moral reasoning legally inferior to a marriage concept created out of whole cloth by coastal judicial elites less than a decade ago.

Judge Walker is of course entitled to his personal opinion and his personal religious beliefs, but placing the weight of his government office behind his theology gives him more “hard power” than the Pope. Is that what the American people really want? After all, not all federal judges share Justice Kennedy’s or Judge Walker’s theology, but they do have equivalent amounts of power.

Most Popular

Media

The Biden Protection Racket

Joe Biden is the most cosseted presidential candidate in memory. He’s run a minimalist campaign that’s avoided the press as much as possible, while the press hasn’t been braying for more access and answers, but eager to avoid anything that could be discomfiting to the campaign. Never before have the ... Read More
Media

The Biden Protection Racket

Joe Biden is the most cosseted presidential candidate in memory. He’s run a minimalist campaign that’s avoided the press as much as possible, while the press hasn’t been braying for more access and answers, but eager to avoid anything that could be discomfiting to the campaign. Never before have the ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: No

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More
Elections

Why Hunter?

Hunter Biden, Joe’s younger son, has become a fixture of the 2020 race. Since August 27, 2019, Donald Trump has tweeted about Hunter 59 separate times, making his colorful past one of the Trump campaign’s most important attacks on his rival. For many years, Hunter struggled with serious drug and alcohol ... Read More
Elections

Why Hunter?

Hunter Biden, Joe’s younger son, has become a fixture of the 2020 race. Since August 27, 2019, Donald Trump has tweeted about Hunter 59 separate times, making his colorful past one of the Trump campaign’s most important attacks on his rival. For many years, Hunter struggled with serious drug and alcohol ... Read More

Trump: Yes

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More

Trump: Yes

Editor’s Note: The following is one of three essays, each from a different perspective, in the latest edition of National Review on the question of whether to vote for President Trump. The views below reflect those of the individual author, not of the NR editorial board as a whole. The other two essays can be ... Read More