Planet Gore

About Google’s Green

Questions about the morality of Google’s Green advocacy are certainly worth asking. As I indicated here, and Business Week coquettishly hinted at in its obscurely titled piece “Google’s New Role: Venture Capitalist,” it seems as if Google’s longtime investor pals and Google itself have a stake in your tax dollars being directed toward the companies in which they have invested, quite obviously in anticipation of mandates and subsidies — and the taxes to pay for them.

As interesting as Google’s selective holiday-making is, it seems to me that the bigger story was Al Gore’s revelations during a 60 Minutes interview this weekend: he and others are funneling $300 million into a massive PR campaign to promote climate alarmism – a tax-exempt effort which also aims to persuade Congress to adopt mandatory “eco-friendly measures,” which would have the salutary effect of making Gore and Google’s mutual Silicon Valley investor friends very rich, as I have explained here.

It’s the Ken Lay/T. Boone Pickens model — of putting one’s mouth where one’s money is. There’s nothing particularly evil about such self-seeking — except when it is sold as altruistic virtue. As is the case with all such “responsible” companies who’ve decided that a sure thing beats competition, and now reap praise for helping scare you into accepting an agenda you otherwise never would — absent the cries of urgency and climate crisis.

Now, again, I ask: who gave Al Gore $300 million to push this agenda?

Most Popular

White House

Mueller’s Got Nothing

The revelations of the last few days are, though disguised, the crash in ignominy of the Robert Mueller putsch. But they are far from the end of the story. While the sire of the Mueller hit-squad assault, former FBI director James Comey, declared 245 times at last Friday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing that ... Read More

The Dangers of Asymmetry

It is strange how suddenly a skeptical Wall Street, CEOs, and even university and think-tank policy analysts are now jumping on the once-taboo Trump bandwagon on China: that if something is not done to stop China’s planned trajectory to global hegemony, based on its repudiation of the entire post-war trade and ... Read More