Planet Gore

Media Matters Demands a Light Bulb Correction!

The crackerjack fact-checkers over at Media Matters have really caught the WSJ this time

In an editorial assailing light bulb efficiency standards signed into law by George W. Bush, the Wall Street Journal claims that “we will all be required to buy compact fluorescent lights, or CFLs.” The Journal adds:

The question an (allegedly) free society should ask is if CFL bulbs are so clearly superior, why does the government have to force people to buy them?

But just last week the Wall Street Journal’s own Gwendolyn Bounds reported that, contrary to the editorial’s claim, consumers will not be limited in their choices to CFLs:

Initially, consumers will find three main alternatives to incandescent bulbs on shelves: halogen-incandescent, compact fluorescent (CFL) and light-emitting diodes (LED). Many are designed similarly to the familiar pear-shaped “A-Line” bulb consumers know. Halogens behave most like existing bulbs, but have an inner capsule filled with halogen gas around a filament to make the bulb about 25% more efficient than a traditional incandescent. They’re also the cheapest alternative at less than $2 each.

“It’s essentially a souped-up incandescent bulb,” says Peter Soares, director of marketing for consumer lighting at Philips Electronics North America.

The Journal’s own reporting establishes that the editorial board needs to issue a correction for falsely telling readers that they will be able to purchase only CFL bulbs after the new standards take effect.

Yes, the WSJ should issue a correction: The Federal Government is forcing you to buy one of three types of crappy, “green” light bulbs instead of the incandescent ones we like.

Most Popular

U.S.

Systemic Racism? Make Them Prove It.

I  worked in the criminal-justice system for a quarter century. It is run, day-to-day, by the crème de la crème of graduates from America’s top law schools. Those institutions wear their progressive bona fides on their sleeves and proclaim it for all the world to hear. In their offhand rhetoric — ... Read More
U.S.

Systemic Racism? Make Them Prove It.

I  worked in the criminal-justice system for a quarter century. It is run, day-to-day, by the crème de la crème of graduates from America’s top law schools. Those institutions wear their progressive bona fides on their sleeves and proclaim it for all the world to hear. In their offhand rhetoric — ... Read More

Why Not Make Democrats Angry?

Some of the Right’s leading thinkers, people I hold in the highest esteem, say circumstances are so unusual right now that the president and the Senate should do something other than what they ordinarily would do when a Supreme Court vacancy occurs: nominate and consider a replacement for Justice Ruth Bader ... Read More

Why Not Make Democrats Angry?

Some of the Right’s leading thinkers, people I hold in the highest esteem, say circumstances are so unusual right now that the president and the Senate should do something other than what they ordinarily would do when a Supreme Court vacancy occurs: nominate and consider a replacement for Justice Ruth Bader ... Read More