Postmodern Conservative

Trump Is Back

Trump’s showing in New York is rather astonishing. It’s only somewhat better than predicted, but I always assumed he’d come up a bit short or more of what the polls and experts expected. What are all those people thinking? Well, for one thing, most of them think Trump can beat Clinton. How could that be?

Most of the minority group composed of those scared of Trump thought Kasich was the safe — if surely futile — choice. We now have evidence that Cruz is poison in a whole region of the country. Folks won’t choose him even as “never Trump.” 

That doesn’t mean Cruz doesn’t remain the favorite for the nomination. As Nate Cohn says, all he has to do win Indiana to keep Trump from getting enough delegates to win on the first ballot, and that Cruz will almost surely do. From this view, Cruz can even lose California and still get nominated on the second ballot. 

Let  me repeat my own view that Cruz can’t get nominated with too much of a disconnect between primary outcomes and the delegate count. Given that his showing in New York was pathetic, and that it might be repeated in Pennsylvania and so forth, he has to win in California more than ever to deny Trump the nomination, no matter how industrious and rational he’s been in getting his guys selected as delegates in other states.

Why is that? You can talk all day about how Cruz has every right to use the strange, complicated, and varied delegate-selection processes to his advantage. And he does. Still, there’s no denying that the principle of legitimacy for the last generation has been “preferential proportional representation.” The convention is supposed to represent at least fairly closely the candidate preferences of the voters.

These ain’t the good old days when the convention was a deliberative body composed of party regulars. There is a reason why the strong majority of Republicans assume and expect that the convention will select the candidate who has prevailed in the primaries and caucuses

The choice of a contested convention is legitimate if  the outcome of those contests is genuinely mixed and more than one candidate can claim the mantle of popular support. That Cruz will be able to do is he wins in California and a few other places in the final weeks. I still think Cruz will achieve that goal. 

Muddying my thinking a bit is the newly disciplined and organized Trump, who we can expect will be less randomly self-destructive in the coming weeks.

So I now think that Cruz has two chances in three of being nominated. Trump one chance in four.

Sanders, meanwhile, needed to win New York and didn’t come close. He now has very little chance of being nominated, and his is a momentum-free environment.

Peter Augustine Lawler — Peter Augustine Lawler is Dana Professor of Government at Berry College. He is executive editor of the acclaimed scholarly quarterly Perspectives on Political Science and served on President George ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Yes, There Was FBI Bias

There is much to admire in Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Clinton-emails investigation. Horowitz’s 568-page analysis is comprehensive, fact-intensive, and cautious to a fault. It is also, nonetheless, an incomplete exercise — it omits half ... Read More

Yes, Hillary Should Have Been Prosecuted

I know this is ancient history, but — I’m sorry — I just can’t let it go. When historians write the definitive, sordid histories of the 2016 election, the FBI, Hillary, emails, Russia, and Trump, there has to be a collection of chapters making the case that Hillary should have faced a jury ... Read More

Let the World Have Soccer

The United States of America did not qualify for the World Cup this year. Good for us. Soccer is corrupt, hyper-regulated, impoverished by a socialist-style fondness for rationing, and organized to strangle human flourishing. It is so dependent on the whims of referees that is in effect a helpless captive of the ... Read More