The Agenda

Brief Note on School Breakfasts

While I understand why school breakfast programs have great appeal, a recent New York Times article by Michael Grynbaum reminds me of why I’m an instinctive skeptic when it comes to expanding government authority: 

The city’s health department hit the pause button after a study found that the Breakfast in the Classroom program, now used in 381 of the city’s 1,750 schools, was problematic because some children might be “inadvertently taking in excess calories by eating in multiple locations” — in other words, having a meal at home, or snacking on the way to school, then eating again in school.

But this week, the City Council speaker, Christine C. Quinn, pushed back against those claims, joining children’s advocacy groups in demanding that New York follow other cities in making in-classroom breakfast available at many more schools with children from low-income families. They say hunger and poor nutrition are serious problems in a city where more than a quarter of residents under 18 are below the poverty line.

So what exactly are children being fed?

“At school, it’s usually a muffin, a cheese stick and juice,” she said, adding, “I’m not so happy about the juice.”

Consider how this might relate to self-reported hunger. I’m one of those devotees of the (somewhat controversial) science writer Gary Taubes, who argues that “diabesity” is caused in large part by the dramatic increase in carbohydrate and sugar intake in the American diet in recent decades. And this dramatic increase flowed in part, Taubes argues, from a misplaced concern about the consumption of fat-rich protein. To get a better sense of Taubes’s thesis, I recommend reading Why We Get Fat or listening to his interview with Russ Roberts. To oversimplify Taubes’s story, public health authorities embraced an unsound hypothesis regarding the origins of metabolic disease and in doing so greatly exacerbated the underlying public health problem. Robert Lustig of UCSF has been making the case that increased sugar intake is the chief culprit in the epidemic of metabolic disease, and Tabes has written extensively on Lustig’s claims.

If Taubes and Lustig are anywhere close to being right, subsidized breakfasts that consist of muffins and juice represent a pretty serious threat to public health. Moreover, excessive carbohydrate consumption might actually exacerbate the self-reported hunger problem. Students seem satiated immediately after completing a carbohydrate-rich meal, yet this effect rarely lasts. The following is from Why We Get Fat:

The hunger that accompanies our attempts to eat fewer calories is an unavoidable physiological phenomenon; the craving for carbohydrates is more like an addiction. It is the consequence, at least in part, of insulin resistance and the chronically elevated levels of insulin that go with it, and thus caused by the carbohydrates in the first place.

Sugars are a special case. As I discussed earlier, sugar appears to be addictive in the brain in the same way in which cocaine, nicotine, and heroin are. This suggests that the relatively intense cravings for sugar—a sweet tooth—may be explained by the intensity of the dopamine secretion in the brain when we consume sugar.

So what are our public health authorities doing? They are (literally) loading up small children with carbohydrates and sugar. Parents who are conscientious about limiting their children’s intake of such foods find themselves in a bind. Because these foods are quite literally addictive, small children will have a hard time resisting them when offered.

Note that part of the reason why programs like this persist is that they create opportunities for private firms that sell the food in question. 

I realize that not everyone agrees with Taubes, Lustig, et al. Perhaps it really is sensible to feed small children a diet rich in sugar and carbohydrates. And in fairness, I imagine a protein-rich diet would also prove controversial, not least because it won’t suit all children or it might prompt religious or ethical or other objections. (That doesn’t mean I wouldn’t support it, however.) Such are the challenges of creating one-size-fits-all public health programs in a diverse society. To be explicit about my own bias, I think that New York city’s public schools are perpetuating and exacerbating a decades-long public health crisis.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular


If Amy Wax Is Wrong, Let’s See the Data

Regarding the kerfuffle Jason Richwine addressed here earlier, the economist Glenn Loury has posted an impassioned plea to his Facebook page. Loury, you may recall, hosts the video blog where Wax made her controversial claim that black students at Penn Law School rarely graduate in the top half of the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

San Francisco Bans Fur Sales

San Francisco has banned the sale of fur. From the CBS-SF story: San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to ban the sale of fur clothing and products. Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a measure that prohibits the sale of fur clothes, accessories, even souvenirs in stores and ... Read More

For the First Time in Weeks, Relief Sweeps over Austin

Making the click-through worthwhile: The Austin bomber is done in by one of his own devices; some new numbers suggest that a small but significant portion of Trump voters are tiring of the chaos and aren’t showing up to support other Republicans in 2018; and the mixed news for conservatives coming out of the ... Read More

The Baleful Effect of #MeToo on Campus

Remember the series of hurricanes that pounded the Caribbean last summer? Something like that has been occurring on college campuses, as they're hit by one destructive mania after another: diversity, Title IX, anti-speech protests. Now it's the #MeToo Movement. In this Martin Center article, British academic ... Read More
Politics & Policy

A Time for Choosing

This year’s Conservative Political Action Conference was controversial. Invitations to European nationalist populists such as Nigel Farage and Marion Maréchal-Le Pen (the niece of Marine Le Pen) caused many longtime conservatives to question whether they still belong to the conservative movement. Vocal critics ... Read More