The Agenda

Gingrich vs. Ryan and the Intra-conservative Medicare Reform Debate

Ross Douthat has written a worthwhile post on the spat between Newt Gingrich and Paul Ryan. I recommend it. I am more inclined to agree with Ryan than with Gingrich. I don’t see transitioning Medicare to a premium support model as right-wing social engineering. That said, the Ryan plan is not the only way to put Medicare on a sustainable footing, and allowing premium support to grow at a somewhat higher rate might ease the transition to a system in which retirees rely more heavily on private savings. As Ross suggests, Gingrich’s criticism of Ryan didn’t deserve to be taken seriously, as Gingrich dodged the question of how we’d pay for a status quo approach.

But I do think that conservatives should be open to a debate about the details of the Ryan plan. A growing number of Republicans have distanced themselves from the particulars of Ryan’s approach, and this creates the danger that Medicare reform will vanish from the agenda. That would be a mistake. A better course would be for serious conservative critics to offer a more “moderate” alternative, e.g., a defined benefit approach that places Medicare FFS and Medicare Advantage plans on a truly level playing field. This wouldn’t achieve the same long-term savings, but it would preserve the value of the underlying benefit and it would encourage business model innovation. 

I would still favor a defined contribution approach, but an all-or-nothing debate makes nothing — that is, no reform of Medicare until we run into a wall — far more likely. 

Reihan Salam is president of the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of National Review.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More