The Agenda

North Korea Thought

During my recent visit to Seoul, I had a number of conversations with political insiders about the prospect of North Korea as a nuclear weapons state. One of my interlocutors, who has been working on inter-Korean issues for decades, advanced an interesting, and encouraging thesis. But before I get to his thesis, I’ll first share the following from the One Free Korea blog:

As policymakers craft their sanctions, however, they shouldn’t lose sight of the objective — to change North Korea.  The U.S. Army isn’t going to do that, and Kim Jong Un certainly won’t.  The only people who are going to get us out of this mess are the North Koreans themselves.  They, not Kim Jong Il, are the ones we should have spent the last decade trying to “engage.” Both Republicans and Democrats tend to lose sight of this key distinction between the North Korean regime, and the more-or-less expendable 98% of its population we need to reach.  (Sure, the “core” class is estimated to be around 20-30%, but anyone can be excommunicated from it at a moment’s notice.) The majority of North Koreans had to be taught to hate us, but they learned to hate their government on their own.  That means there’s a common interest we can appeal to. [Emphasis added]

This is perfectly sensible advice. Yet OFK parts company with my interlocutor in that my interlocutor believes that North Korea’s decision to declare itself a nuclear weapons state is actually a prelude to an opening. Nuclearization will create the impression that the decision to, for example, expand limited experiments in economic openness like the Kaesong Industrial Region is happening not from a place of weakness, but rather from (relative) strength. The regime will have demonstrated its robustness, perhaps to constituencies within the North Korean power elite more than to the international audience, and this matters because the North Korean leadership is intensely xenophobic and paranoid. Think about it: if you’re constantly worried about foreign infiltrators and the obliteration of your state, you’re not likely to want to open up your society to the potential for subversion and who knows what else. With a nuclear weapon in your back pocket, you can, in theory at least, ease up a bit. 

I wouldn’t bet the farm on this outcome, and it may well represent wishful thinking. But my interlocutor is a hard-nosed observer of North Korea’s periodic freakouts over the past several decades and I’m inclined to trust his judgment. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

White House

Democrats in Peril

I will just make a prediction and try to keep out of the swamp of Trump-obsession as the weeks unfold. The anti-Trump movement is now in inexorable decline; it is a little like the Nixon defense forces after the Saturday Night drama in October 1973, with the departure of the attorney general, his deputy, and ... Read More

Canada Is Attacked Again

Media coverage of yesterday’s monstrous van attack in Toronto, which as of this writing is responsible for ten deaths and more than a dozen other casualties, was punctuated by political press conferences of the sort that are now an inescapable part of the dark theater of public tragedies. At his first ... Read More

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More