The Agenda

Philip K. Howard’s Start-Over Movement

Appropriately, Philip K. Howard of the Common Good Foundation has an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal on public sector reform that puts the repeal of SB 5 in perspective:

“I’ve never seen anyone terminated for incompetence,” observed a long-time human relations official in New York City. In Cincinnati, police personnel records must be expunged every few years—making periodic misconduct essentially unaccountable. Over the past decade, Los Angeles succeeded in firing five teachers (out of 33,000), at a cost of $3.5 million.

Collective-bargaining rights have made government virtually unmanageable. Promotions, reassignments and layoffs are dictated by rigid rules, without any opportunity for managerial judgment. In 2010, shortly after receiving an award as best first-year teacher in Wisconsin, Megan Sampson had to be let go under “last in, first out” provisions of the union contract.

Even what task someone should do on a given day is subject to detailed rules. Last year, when a virus disabled two computers in a shared federal office in Washington, D.C., the IT technician fixed one but said he was unable to fix the other because it wasn’t listed on his form.

Making things work better is an affront to union prerogatives. The refuse-collection union in Toledo sued when the city proposed consolidating garbage collection with the surrounding county. (Toledo ended up making a cash settlement.) In Wisconsin, when budget cuts eliminated funding to mow the grass along the roads, the union sued to stop the county executive from giving the job to inmates.

No decision is too small for union micromanagement. Under the New York City union contract, when new equipment is installed the city must reopen collective bargaining “for the sole purpose of negotiating with the union on the practical impact, if any, such equipment has on the affected employees.” Trying to get ideas from public employees can be illegal. A deputy mayor of New York City was “warned not to talk with employees in order to get suggestions” because it might violate the “direct dealing law.”

As Howard goes on to observe, the total compensation bill for the 20 million U.S. residents who work for federal, state, and local governments amounts to $1.5 trillion (or 10% of GDP). Government spends an additional $2 trillion. A 30% gain in efficiency would save taxpayers an extraordinary $1 trillion. 

This brings to mind a brief passage from Walter Isaacson’s biography of Steve Jobs:

[Tim] Cook reduced the number of Apple’s key suppliers from a hundred to twenty-four, forced them to cut betters deals to keep the business, convinced many to locate next to Apple’s plants, and closed ten of the company’s nineteen warehouses. By reducing the places where inventory could pile up, he reduced inventory. Jobs had cut inventory from two months’ worth or product down to one by early 1998. By September of that year, Cook had gotten it down to six days. By the following September, it was down to an amazing two days’ worth. In addition, he cut the production process for making an Apple computer from four months to two. [A new Bloomberg BusinessWeek article has more on the continuing evolution of Apple’s supply-chain.]

The inevitable rejoinder is that government is not a business, which is true. A smarter rejoinder, however, is that much of what government does — like cutting Social Security checks — can’t really be made much more “efficient” than it is, as the overhead involved is actually fairly straightforward. There are, however, many domains, particularly at the state and local level, in which public sector organizations deliver services that involve combining technology and labor in various different ways, not unlike a private firm. We know, for example, that private organizations can deliver things like instruction, medical care, etc. Many on the left believe that deeper integration of, say, the delivery of health services would yield considerable efficiency gains, which may well be true in some cases. But the real question is how well integrated are the services — i.e., how well are the public sector firms in question combining capital and labor? 

And a key issue, as Howard suggests, is whether public sector firms have the flexibility to organize production in new, more effective ways — or if they must bribe, cajole, and fight every inch of the way to make even the slightest change. Students of organizational capital can see why this resistance to organizational innovation is absolutely crippling. 

Howard is absolutely right:

America must bulldoze the current system and start over. Only then can we balance budgets and restore competence, dignity and purpose to public service.

But time is short, and conservatives don’t seem to fully appreciate the gravity of the challenge. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

PC Culture

John Oliver’s Micro-Trolling

John Oliver is sometimes classified as a political satirist, but what he really seems to fancy is nonsensical trolling. Remember his big idea for taking down Donald Trump two years ago? It was a lengthy segment making fun of an ancestral name, Drumpf, that might have been changed to Trump as far back as the 17th ... Read More
White House

The Anti-Trump Effort Backfires

No one following the Russian-collusion and related dramas should be in any doubt about the steady flow of the balance of damaging evidence away from Trump and on to his accusers. It is clear that the hierarchy of the FBI and analogues in the Justice Department and intelligence services, horrified at the thought ... Read More
PC Culture

The Confederate Mind

Senator Elizabeth Warren has doubled down on her insistence that she is Native American. The New One-Drop Fixation In her past incarnations, she probably used that yarn in hopes of helping her win a law professorship at Harvard, which touted her as the law school’s first indigenous-American professor (and ... Read More

The Truth Hurts at Penn Law

One of the chief criticisms of affirmative action is that it devalues credentials that minorities could otherwise use to distinguish themselves. If college admissions were purely merit-based, employers would have no reason to discount an impressive degree just because it is held by a black or Hispanic applicant. ... Read More
Science & Tech

The Social-Media Panic

‘Make no mistake: 2016 will never happen again.” Historians are not always reliable predictors of the future, but Niall Ferguson’s analysis of how Silicon Valley and the center-Left would react to the successive and surprise victories of Brexit and Donald Trump is proving correct. Conservatives and ... Read More
White House

The Real Collusion Story

Barack Obama keeps a close watch on his emotions. “I loved Spock,” he wrote in February 2015 in a presidential statement eulogizing Leonard Nimoy. Growing up in Hawaii, the young man who would later be called “No-Drama Obama” felt a special affinity for the Vulcan first officer of the U.S.S. Enterprise. ... Read More