The Agenda

Quick Backgrounder on High Marginal Tax Rates

I’ve noticed that some new readers seem to believe that hiking marginal tax rates on high earners is a no-brainer. It occurs to me that many readers aren’t regular readers, but rather people who’ve found their way here via the occasional link. So here are a few things to keep in mind:

(1) Raising marginal tax rates vs. broadening the tax base

The tax code offers many provisions — credits, deductions, exemptions, etc. — that have the effect of reducing taxable income. All of these provisions are designed to advance public policy goals, some of them more questionable than others. Actually, some of them were essentially accidents of history that acquired powerful constituencies over time, but the upshot is the same. Scholars call these provisions tax expenditures, because they operate much like any other spending program. Some critics say that this is unfair: these tax provisions allow taxpayers to keep money that is already theirs. And there’s something to that. But the tax code only allows you to keep the income you’ve earned if you’ve jumped through a certain hoop.

Some of these provisions, like the child tax credit and the EITC, mainly benefit households with low to moderate incomes. If the goal is to aid poor households, it often makes sense to make a tax credit refundable, i.e., to actually transfer cash above and beyond actual tax liability. But most of these provisions benefit the affluent. At higher tax rates, something like the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored coverage becomes more valuable, which creates a perverse situation in which we’re delivering a bigger benefit to the rich than to the poor. 

While there’s a decent case for retaining something like the EITC and the child tax credit, clearing out these other tax provisions would dramatically broaden the tax base and simplify the onerous process of figuring out what taxpayers owe the federal government. And clearing the code of tax expenditures would also raise far more revenue than creating new tax brackets for high earners.

(2) Bang-for-the-buck

People often say, “I know a great way to raise tax revenue. We’ll create a X percent bracket for people making (whatever I earn in a given year)(n).” There’s a problem, however: you’re only gaining revenue from the incremental increase, but the disincentive effect is as strong as if you were taxing all income at the new rate. 

(3) How big are these disincentive effects anyway? 

Here we have a big, ongoing debate: everyone agrees that taxes have some disincentive effect, but how strong is this effect and when does it kick in? My colleague Arpit Gupta has written on this subject for Economics 21 a number of times, and I’ve shamelessly promoted his posts. His commentary on “Tax Increases and Behavioral Responses” does an excellent job of summarizing the state of the debate.

I am in the camp that believes that we need more tax revenues but also that we need much lower marginal tax rates and lower taxes on capital income. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Film & TV

In Unsane, Aetna Meets Kafka

Unsane doesn’t take the form of a horror film; at first, it appears to be a Hitchcockian thriller about mistaken identity or perhaps getting ensnared in a web of bureaucracy. Yet with clinical detachment it develops into a nerve-flaying story almost too agonizing to endure. Unlike most horror movies, it isn’t ... Read More
Science & Tech

The Real Deal With the Tech Giants

A bit of dialogue from the old television series Person of Interest, where a reclusive billionaire programmer and a former CIA agent use a giant supercomputer to predict crimes and save people: FINCH: Hester's living off the grid. No photos online and nothing on the social networking sites. REESE: I've never ... Read More

Viva l’Italia?

Italy has just had elections, with very interesting results. I wanted to talk with Alberto Mingardi, which I have. He is one of the leading classical liberals in Italy -- the director general of the Bruno Leoni Institute, in Milan. (Mingardi himself is Milanese.) He is also an authority in arts and letters. In ... Read More

Putin and the Cult of Leadership

On Sunday, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin won an unsurprising reelection-campaign victory against Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin, by a margin of 76.7 percent to 11.8 percent. The results were unsurprising because Putin is a tyrant who murders or imprisons political rivals, and who isn’t afraid to use ... Read More

Trump and Brexit Derangement Syndrome

I am not one of those Brexiteers who believe that Brexit and Trumpism are essentially the same phenomenon in two different countries. To be sure, they both draw on some of the same political trends, notably a distrust of elites and an upsurge of popular anger over evident failures of public policy such as illegal ... Read More

Stand Up to Putin

President Putin’s landslide victory in Russia’s presidential election was achieved against the lackluster competition of a group of mediocre candidates from which the sole serious opponent had been excluded; amid plausible allegations that his security services had tried to poison two Russians in England by ... Read More