The Agenda

Quick Thought on Misconceptions Regarding the Romney Medicare Proposal

Recently, I noticed the following characterization of Mitt Romney’s Medicare proposal:

The first is Romney’s: huge defense spending increases and lower tax revenues than the Bush regime, accompanied by turning Medicare into a voluntary voucher scheme, where you will henceforth be guaranteed only the healthcare your voucher affords.

Robert Pear of the New York Times offered a notably different characterization:

Another crucial question is how the federal contribution to private plans would be calculated, updated and increased from year to year. If the government starts with the current level of Medicare spending and increases it to keep pace with the Consumer Price Index or the size of the economy, it would cover a smaller and smaller share of medical costs, which have historically grown faster than those benchmarks.

Under his proposal, Mr. Romney says, the government contribution would be based on competitive bidding. An insurer’s bid would reflect its estimate of the cost of providing a standard package of benefits to a typical beneficiary. Mr. Romney says tax increases are “off the table” as a way to deal with Medicare’s financial problems. He would gradually increase the eligibility age for Medicare, now 65, by one month a year. In the long run, he says, the eligibility age should rise with life expectancy. [Emphasis added]

Pear could have written this a bit more clearly, but the government contribution is based on the cost of providing a standard package of benefits to a typical beneficiary, as determined through a competitive bidding process. Adjustments would be made based on age and health status. 

So what exactly does it mean to say that beneficiaries “will henceforth be guaranteed only the healthcare your voucher affords”? In this case, it means that the amount of the government contribution will be explicitly pegged to amount of healthcare one receives under the standard Medicare package that exists today. Yuval Levin has described the logic of this approach at length, and we’ve discussed it in this space as well. 

One huge problem, however, is that the Romney campaign hasn’t been sufficiently proactive in clarifying misconceptions about the former Massachusetts governor’s Medicare proposal, as evidenced by a Google search. To be sure, there Romney proposal isn’t as detailed as an actual legislative proposal would have to be. But we do have a good sense of its broad outline. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

It’s the Stock Market, Stupid

Before going any further, I must say that I don’t believe Protectionist Donald really will go all the way with his present attempt to strangle global trade. I believe that the end run will be quite similar to what it was with the steel and aluminum tariffs — which is to say, a photo op in the Oval Office. ... Read More

Ten Things that Caught My Eye Today (March 23, 2018)

I send out a free weekly e-mail newsletter that typically goes out Saturday mornings and includes WFB flashbacks, Firing Line videos, upcoming events, and some of what I’ve been up to. Sign up here. 1. Cardinal Timothy Dolan in the Wall Street Journal: Talking about New York, he noted: 2. The Guardian on the ... Read More
National Review

Palm Sunday with WFB

The wonderful National Review Institute forum in New York City last month, held on the tenth anniversary of Bill Buckley’s death -- but truly a celebration of his life and legacy -- was captured by the good folks at C-SPAN, who now tell us that two panels of the forum will be broadcast this Sunday on C-SAN 3. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Sliming of Bari Weiss

If you follow at all the ideological war that’s erupted around the New York Times editorial page, then you know Bari Weiss. It’s too much to call Bari conservative. A better description might be heterodox. On some issues, particularly social issues and immigration, she’s a woman of the Left. On others — ... Read More
Politics & Policy

How the Nazis Used Gun Control

The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the Communists and Nazis committing acts of political violence did ... Read More