The Agenda

The Richmond Fed Interviews John List

The latest issue of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s Region Focus includes a wide-ranging interview with the University of Chicago’s John List, one of the leading practitioners of experimental economics. Early on, List describes his early work on charitable donations:

Let’s say the typical way inwhich a charity asks for money is a mail solicitation. So whatwe are going to do is partner with them in one of their mailsolicitations. Say they send out 50,000 letters a month. Wewill then randomize those 50,000 letters that go directly tohouseholds into different treatments. One household might receive a letter that says, “Please give to our charity. Everydollar you give will be matched with $3 from us.” Anotherhousehold might receive the exact same letter, but the onlything that changes is that we tell them that every dollar yougive will be matched by $2. Another household receives a $1 match offer. And, finally, another household will receive aletter that doesn’t mention matching. So you fill these treatment cells with thousands of households that don’t knowthey’re part of an experiment. We’re using randomization tolearn about whether the match works. That’s an example ofa natural field experiment — completed in a natural environment and the task is commonplace. 

I didn’t learn that 3-to-1 works better than 2-to-1 or 1-to-1. Empirically, what happens is, the match in and of itself works really well. We raise about 20 percent moremoney when there is a match available. But, the 3-to-1, 2-to-1, and 1-to-1 matches work about the same. 

As you can imagine, this information would be of great significance to a charity, and perhaps even to policymakers. List goes on to describe how and why patterns of charitable giving are markedly different between the U.S. and Europe. The bulk of the conversation, however, is conceptual, including the following riff on behavioral economics:

I think a general statement about behavioral economics would be as follows: If I want to take a trip from Chicago to Fenway Park — say I want to go watch the Red Sox play the Yankees — neoclassical theory will get me to Cambridge. But I need behavioral economics to get me from Cambridge to my seat in the 25th row of Fenway Park. And what that means is that I think behavioral economics is important to explain behavior at the individual level, but if we want to get into the vicinity of the correct answer, neoclassical economics can get us there. And then around the margin, behavioral economics does really well at pinpointing and helping us refine that answer.

I recommend taking a look.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

White House

The Problem Isn’t Just the GOP, Mr. Comey

During a CNN town hall on Wednesday night, James Comey alleged that the Republican party allows President Trump to get away with making inappropriate statements without holding him accountable. “If the Republicans, if they just close their eyes and imagine Barack Obama waking up in the morning saying someone ... Read More
Law & the Courts

‘Judges for the #Resistance’

At Politico, I wrote today about the judiciary’s activism against Trump on immigration: There is a lawlessness rampant in the land, but it isn’t emanating from the Trump administration. The source is the federal judges who are making a mockery of their profession by twisting the law to block the Trump ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Friendships Are America’s Asset

The stale, clichéd conceptions of Donald Trump held by both Left and Right — a man either utterly useless or only rigidly, transactionally tolerable — conceal the fact that the president does possess redeeming talents that are uniquely his, and deserve praise on their own merit. One is personal friendliness ... Read More

Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More