The Agenda

Romney’s Meet the Press Remarks on Health Reform and Taxes

It has been immensely amusing to watch news analysts vacillate between characterizing Romney-Ryan as right-wing extremists and as opportunists willing to do anything or say anything to win an election. As should be obvious, these perspectives are very much in tension with each other.

One can of course imagine a scenario in which an opportunist will say anything to get elected and will then act as an extremist. This is a popular critique of the Obama administration. The more potent critique of the Obama administration, in my view, is that it has pursued a broadly social democratic and environmentalist agenda — tax expenditures focused on the low-income and middle-income households rather than rate cuts designed to improve work incentives, coverage expansion, health care cost control via administrative price-setting, an industrial policy devoted to curbing coal-fired power generation and to promoting renewables, etc. — while doing what it can to contain the political backlash that might result from going too far beyond centrist public opinion, hence the abandonment of more ambitious ideas, e.g., substantial tax increases relative to current policy, carbon pricing, more aggressive and explicit administrative price-setting, and so forth. Ryan Lizza’s reporting on President Obama’s possible plans for a second term suggest that he might pursue some of the ideas in this second bucket, which makes perfect sense. 

By analogy, it seems likely that a Romney-Ryan agenda would be similarly constrained by public opinion, just as the Reagan administration was constrained in its efforts to, among other things, federalize Medicaid while assigning state governments exclusive responsibility for K-12 education and welfare expenditures (the “swap”), reform Social Security Disability Insurance by tightening eligibility standards, among other initiatives that were abandoned or scaled back. Some of the more outlandish criticisms of Romney-Ryan rest on the premise that a Romney White House would be indifferent to public opinion. But even if a Romney administration were as indifferent to public opinion on some discrete issues as the Obama administration was on the subject of its coverage expansion effort, it is hard to imagine the nightmare scenarios invoked by former President Bill Clinton and other Democrats actually materializing. 

Recently, Mitt Romney restated a number of positions those of us who’ve been paying attention have known about for some time in an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press, as the Associated Press reports. He noted that his health reform plan would seek to “make sure that those with pre-existing conditions can get coverage,” and that he agreed that young adults should be allowed to remain covered under their parents’ health insurance policies. He also said that “we’re not going to have high-income people pay less of the tax burden than they pay today,” i.e., his tax reform will aim to maintain the current progressivity of the federal personal income tax.

Romney’s unremarkable remarks are being treated as significant concessions or retreats from his stated views. They are not. This isn’t to say they are wise, e.g., I’m not sure imposing a mandate that private insurance coverage must cover adult children is a good idea, particularly if it makes private insurance coverage substantially more expensive.

Tyler Cowen offers a somewhat different take. He believes that a Romney administration would preserve something like the individual mandate under a different name. My own view is that a solution that featured default enrollment with an opt-out provision,  as in Scott Winship’s “citizen benefits” model, would be perfectly acceptable.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

White House

The Anti-Trump Effort Backfires

No one following the Russian-collusion and related dramas should be in any doubt about the steady flow of the balance of damaging evidence away from Trump and on to his accusers. It is clear that the hierarchy of the FBI and analogues in the Justice Department and intelligence services, horrified at the thought ... Read More
Science & Tech

The Real Deal With the Tech Giants

A bit of dialogue from the old television series Person of Interest, where a reclusive billionaire programmer and a former CIA agent use a giant supercomputer to predict crimes and save people: FINCH: Hester's living off the grid. No photos online and nothing on the social networking sites. REESE: I've never ... Read More

Viva l’Italia?

Italy has just had elections, with very interesting results. I wanted to talk with Alberto Mingardi, which I have. He is one of the leading classical liberals in Italy -- the director general of the Bruno Leoni Institute, in Milan. (Mingardi himself is Milanese.) He is also an authority in arts and letters. In ... Read More

Putin and the Cult of Leadership

On Sunday, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin won an unsurprising reelection-campaign victory against Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin, by a margin of 76.7 percent to 11.8 percent. The results were unsurprising because Putin is a tyrant who murders or imprisons political rivals, and who isn’t afraid to use ... Read More

Trump and Brexit Derangement Syndrome

I am not one of those Brexiteers who believe that Brexit and Trumpism are essentially the same phenomenon in two different countries. To be sure, they both draw on some of the same political trends, notably a distrust of elites and an upsurge of popular anger over evident failures of public policy such as illegal ... Read More

Stand Up to Putin

President Putin’s landslide victory in Russia’s presidential election was achieved against the lackluster competition of a group of mediocre candidates from which the sole serious opponent had been excluded; amid plausible allegations that his security services had tried to poison two Russians in England by ... Read More

Nordic Welfare States Worsen the Gender Gap

Following International Women's Day 2018, a host of policies have been promoted as ways to advance women's careers. CNBC, for example, has run a story arguing that policies such as parental leave for both parents can raise women’s incomes. In the Huffington Post we can read that adopting the welfare policies of ... Read More