The Agenda

‘Where’s the Growth?’

How can we possibly believe that low marginal tax rates are good for growth if we’ve had lackluster growth and relatively low marginal tax rates! The relevant question is this: would growth performance have been even worse under higher marginal tax rates? The problem, of course, is that this question is extremely difficult if not impossible answer. The folk response to this question is, “Well, growth was spectacular in the 1990s, after an increase in MTRs!” Which is true! But one can again argue that growth would have been stronger had MTRs been lower.

Moreover, we have to tease out the short-run impacts of changes in MTRs from long-run impacts, as firms and industries respond over long periods of time to changing tax environments. Path dependence is a very powerful force, and prime-age workers vary in their elasticities, e.g., a worker with children and a mortgage isn’t in a great position to choose more leisure, but a worker approaching retirement is in a somewhat better position to do so. This is a case for varying tax rates according to demographic characteristics, e.g., age and gender. Yet I suspect that this wouldn’t go down very well with the voting public, though of course we offer innumerable tax breaks pegged to other qualities that aren’t obviously sensible for discrimination. Why people who have a strong proclivity towards homeownership should get a huge tax break remains a mystery to me, in part because I find the arguments from good citizenship to asset-building unconvincing in the extreme. (There are other, cheaper ways to pursue said goals.)  

And all kinds of other issues enter the picture. Tax policy interacts with other policies in many different, complicated ways. My basic view is that, for the reasons Alan Viard and others have carefully explained, high marginal tax rates have negative incentive effects that outweigh the potential revenue gains, while curbing tax expenditures yield revenue gains without the negative incentive effects, though of course there are distributional considerations.

I find that I feel compelled write this post at least once every two weeks. 

Most Popular

Elections

About That ‘Broken Algorithm’

Of all the loopy assertions made at the press conference President Trump’s legal team conducted last Thursday, the one that has been most roundly derided is the since-ousted Sidney Powell’s claim that the national popular vote was such a landslide for President Trump “that it broke the algorithm that had ... Read More
Elections

About That ‘Broken Algorithm’

Of all the loopy assertions made at the press conference President Trump’s legal team conducted last Thursday, the one that has been most roundly derided is the since-ousted Sidney Powell’s claim that the national popular vote was such a landslide for President Trump “that it broke the algorithm that had ... Read More
Elections

Election 2020’s Endgame

Today on the menu: States are certifying their votes, and Trump's legal team is in turmoil. The 2020 Election Starts to Wind Down Michigan and Pennsylvania are set to certify their election results today, and Nevada is scheduled to do the same tomorrow. Saturday night, U.S. district judge Matthew W. ... Read More
Elections

Election 2020’s Endgame

Today on the menu: States are certifying their votes, and Trump's legal team is in turmoil. The 2020 Election Starts to Wind Down Michigan and Pennsylvania are set to certify their election results today, and Nevada is scheduled to do the same tomorrow. Saturday night, U.S. district judge Matthew W. ... Read More