The Campaign Spot

Thompson, Welcomed to the Race With Hard Questions on Supporting Issue Ad Restrictions

When Laura Ingraham asked Fred Thompson about his support for various provisions in McCain-Feingold, Thompson suggested that while he voted for the overall bill, he didn’t necessarily support every provision. The Club For Growth is unimpressed, and notes that Thompson filed an amicus brief  to the Supreme Court defending not only the original language banning groups from running issue ads, but a Wellstone amendment that made it more restrictive. Jen Rubin contends Thompson’s “first crack at the answer is not going to suffice.”

UPDATE: Fred, during the interview: “My main motivation for campaign finance reform — the issue ad thing wasn’t even being discussed as far as I remember when the first debates were had and the first bill was proposed — it was a matter of whether or not you wanted to get rid of soft money. Bill Clinton and Dick Morris showed that you could use soft money in ways that people thought you would get put in jail for a short time ago. So they poured it in, instead of having the agreed upon limitations that historically as Democrats, Republicans, conservatives, liberals, and everybody else had pretty much acknowledged were constitutional because they had to do with federal elections and the idea that you don’t want to give too much money to any individual member of Congress and then come and lobby him for a bill. That’s called bribery in the real world! But they came in with this soft money to do the same thing, and through the back door. We wanted to do away with that.”

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More