The Campaign Spot

A Vile Tale, From Unnamed Sources, Exciting the Blogs on the Left

It will come as a great shock to you that liberal blogs are spotlighting a tale from a book by “Netroots author Cliff Schecter” that cites “reporters from Arizona on condition of anonymity” who claim McCain said something quite nasty to his wife on the campaign trail back in 1992. You can find the exact language at the link, but basically it’s mocking her appearance and using a vulgar term for a woman that will usually get a speaker slapped.

Because, you know, Arizona reporters would never report that at the time. A sitting senator up for reelection using that kind of language to his wife’s face, in front of reporters, just wouldn’t be newsworthy. Those reporters would hold onto that story, and keep it secret, as McCain became a prominent national figure in the 1990s, throughout the 2000 race, throughout McCain’s campaign of the last year and a half, just so they could reveal it now to “Netroots author Cliff Schecter” — because his book is the right venue to reveal this shocking outburst. Obviously, it’s extremely plausible that these three reporters would tell Schecter this instead of reporting on the outburst themselves, because journalists are well known for casually giving away shocking scoops to other reporters. It happens all the time. Yes, this field is one big happy scoop-sharing cooperative.
Schecter tells another liberal site that the Arizona papers didn’t report on it because “uneasiness about how to get such a coarse exchange into a family newspaper.”
Right. Asterisks and dashes weren’t invented until the late 1990s, so there was no way newspapers could give readers a sense of what McCain said without spelling out the actual comment. And only recent breakthroughs in technology have permitted this technique called “paraphrasing” that gives readers a sense of what was said without actually spelling out bad words.
I know I should be outraged by this, but it’s just more or less par for the course over on that side of the aisle. It will be interesting to see if any MSM outlet pays any attention to this light-years-from-verified mud.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

At the Democratic-primary debate in Houston last night, Beto O’Rourke formally killed off one of the gun-control movement’s favorite taunts: The famous “Nobody is coming for your guns, wingnut.” Asked bluntly whether he was proposing confiscation, O’Rourke abandoned the disingenuous euphemisms that have ... Read More
White House

Politico Doubles Down on Fake Turnberry Scandal

It's tough to be an investigative reporter. Everybody who feeds you a tip has an axe to grind. Or, alternatively, you find yourself going, "I wonder if . . . ?" You put in your research, you talk to lots of people, you accumulate a huge pile of information, but you still haven't proved your hypothesis. A wise ... Read More
Politics & Policy

CNN: Everything but the News

For a while, we thought MSNBC had temporarily usurped CNN as the font of fake news — although both networks had tied for the most negative coverage (93 percent of all their news reports) of President Trump’s first 100 days in office. A cynic would argue that CNN had deliberately given Trump undue coverage ... Read More