Courts Are Letting Social-Media Platforms Get Away with Manipulating Children

A Utah judge was wrong to strike down the state’s attempt to protect kids from social media’s harms.

Share this story

gpetric/iStock/Getty Images

Earlier this month, Judge Robert Shelby of the U.S. District Court of Utah declared unconstitutional the Utah Minor Protection in Social Media Act, which the state legislature passed this spring. We believe this is an act of judicial activism that is based on flawed reasoning, legally and practically.

You don’t need social scientists to tell you something is wrong. Parents can look around and see for themselves: Kids aren’t talking to each other or the adults in their lives. Instead they are staring down at screens, lost in their own virtual world. This behavior is not accidental; nor are the deleterious effects that social scientists such as Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation, and Jean Twenge have documented. Social media have conducted a radical experiment on our kids. Algorithms and addictive design features determine what our kids see and learn, with no parental involvement or oversight. The result has been major spikes in the rates of teen anxiety, depression, suicide, and self-harm.

Clare Morell

About the Author

Clare Morell

Clare Morell is a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of The Tech Exit: A Practical Guide to Freeing Kids and Teens from Smartphones.

AC

About the Author

Adam Candeub

Adam Candeub is a professor of law at Michigan State University’s College of Law and a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement