A Gun-Control Advocate and His Fabricated ‘Facts’

Professor Saul Cornell admits he willfully misrepresented a study on the lethality of firearms.

Share this story

AR-15 rifles at a gun store in Reno, Nev., in 2012.

Michael Macor/The San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images

Saul Cornell is a professor of history at Fordham, a gun-control advocate, and a contributor to Slate. I have concluded that he fabricated evidence for his most recent article.

If you follow the gun-control debate, then you are used to gun-control advocates (some of whom pose as straight-news reporters) making elementary mistakes, often out of pure ignorance — for example, they regularly confuse semiautomatic weapons (which fire one round with each pull of the trigger) and fully automatic weapons (machine guns) or dramatically understate current restrictions on gun sales. As I will show in this column, this is not a mistake of that kind — it is an actual fabrication, a made-up “fact” of the sort associated with such journalistic fantasists as Jayson Blair and Stephen Glass.

Kevin D. Williamson

About the Author

Kevin D. Williamson

Kevin D. Williamson is a former fellow at National Review Institute and a former roving correspondent for National Review.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement