A Pause in House Redistricting Cases Could Be Good News

There are multiple ways in which the Supreme Court could go even bigger against court-ordered racial gerrymanders by delaying the Louisiana case until the fall.

Share this story

A general view of the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., June 1, 2024.

Will Dunham/Reuters

The end of June was anticlimactic for House redistricting lawsuits. The Supreme Court, after leaving Louisiana v. Callais on the short list of cases to decide on the final day of its term, instead announced (over a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas) that Callais and a companion case also involving Louisiana’s congressional map were “restored to the calendar for reargument,” presumably in the fall. Meanwhile, in another unexpected move, the Wisconsin Supreme Court declined to reopen Wisconsin’s congressional map. The current map was drawn by Democratic Governor Tony Evers to make it through the Republican legislature, but Democrats had hoped that liberal control of the state supreme court — solidified by an April 1 election — would result in a judicial push to redraw the maps more in Democrats’ favor. Indeed, that assumption was widely shared by partisans on both sides of the state supreme court election.

Stalemate

Dan McLaughlin

About the Author

Dan McLaughlin

Dan McLaughlin is a senior writer at National Review Online and a fellow at National Review Institute.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement