A Ticking Time Bomb in Anti-Terrorism Law

Judge Myrna Pérez’s recent opinion in the case of Akayed Ullah is not only muddled but genuinely dangerous.

Share this story

Police officers stand in a closed-off underground walkway near the site of a pipe bomb explosion in New York City, December 11, 2017.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down an opinion that will probably fail to receive much coverage, but it should.

The case concerns a would-be suicide terrorist by the name of Akayed Ullah, who, just six years after arriving in the United States from Bangladesh in 2011, set off a pipe bomb at the Times Square subway station. The device only partially detonated, leaving himself and five others injured. After the attack, Ullah told investigators that he had done so on behalf of ISIS.

EA

About the Author

Erielle Azerrad

Erielle Azerrad serves as deputy chief counsel to Senator Ted Cruz and is a senior fellow at the Center for the Middle East and International Law at George Mason University. She practiced anti-terrorism litigation for several years prior. The thoughts presented are her own and not necessarily representative of her office.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement