An M.I.A. Congress Exacerbates the Clash Between Trump and the Courts

Congress has to step up and take some responsibility for the shaping of public policy.

Share this story

President Donald Trump delivers remarks in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., March 21, 2025.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Despite the hand-wringing of the commentariat, the fights between the Trump White House and some federal trial judges has yet to reach a “constitutional crisis.” A few federal district judges have issued scores of injunctions temporarily blocking some elements of Trump’s agenda for his first 100 days. But rather than a breakdown in the constitutional order, this jostling fulfills the Framers’ design for the separation of powers, which encourages conflict between the branches of government.

Some blame the problem on an overly aggressive Donald Trump, bent on expanding executive power beyond constitutional limits. Others criticize Democrat-appointed federal district judges, seeing them as politicized activists forming the spearhead of unconstitutional resistance to Trump’s initiatives. In these visions, we have an Imperial Presidency pitted against an Imperial Judiciary.

John Yoo

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).

RD

About the Author

Robert J. Delahunty

Robert J. Delahunty is a fellow at the Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement