For a newspaper that often emphasizes the importance of “context,” the New York Times’ breaking coverage of U.S. Marine veteran Daniel Penny’s acquittal lacked precisely this.
And by “lacked,” I mean its coverage bordered on defamatory.
by Becket Adams
For my friends, ‘context.’ For my enemies, insinuation.
Share this story
Daniel Penny arrives at the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse in New York City, December 9, 2024.
Alex Kent/Stringer via Getty Images
For a newspaper that often emphasizes the importance of “context,” the New York Times’ breaking coverage of U.S. Marine veteran Daniel Penny’s acquittal lacked precisely this.
And by “lacked,” I mean its coverage bordered on defamatory.

About the Author
Becket Adams is a columnist for National Review, the Washington Examiner, and The Hill.
Advertisement
Advertisement
For a newspaper that often emphasizes the importance of “context,” the New York Times’ breaking coverage of U.S. Marine veteran Daniel Penny’s acquittal lacked precisely this.
And by “lacked,” I mean its coverage bordered on defamatory.

About the Author
Becket Adams is a columnist for National Review, the Washington Examiner, and The Hill.
Advertisement
Advertisement
By continuing, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Comments