Blood Father is a better return of Mad Max than last yearโ€™s Mad Max: Fury Road, because Mel Gibson, the original roustabout, comes back on a motorbike trailblazing a wake-up vision of himself and of Americaโ€™s generational relations. In this action-plus-family tale, Gibson portrays Link, a repentant alcoholic and estranged parent who protects his wayward daughter from the drug-dealers with whom she rebelled. The premise is as satisfying as that of Liam Neesonโ€™s Taken franchise, but with Linkโ€™s campaign through the trailer-park badlands of Californiaโ€™s Coachella Valley suggesting an Old West version of Hollywood. The wrinkled, bearded Gibson brings a history of likable derring-do, and, for some of us, he still carries an underdogโ€™s goodwill.

Blood Father starts with contrition. Its title implies the mercy and clemency due oneโ€™s own โ€” not just Linkโ€™s care for his offspring, Lydia (Erin Moriarty), but the compassion earned by a movie star who previously claimed oneโ€™s affection and has worked throughout his career with honesty and integrity. Youโ€™d have to go back to the Fatty Arbuckle scandal of the silent era to find a media-wide defamation equivalent to the obloquy Gibson suffered as a result of his Christianity-professing 2004 film The Passion of the Christ. (This is at the core of the national breakdown I described in โ€œThe Year the Culture Broke.โ€) Blood Father gives traction to Gibsonโ€™s career recovery.

Yes, Blood Fatherโ€™s title also evokes The Godfather, and it is impossible to watch the conflict between this filmโ€™s self-conscious (almost Catholic) sinners and their law-breaking trials that test family loyalty without thinking of Francis Coppolaโ€™s gangster epic. The Godfather normalized moviegoersโ€™ relationship to moral compromise โ€” perhaps the single most significant cultural shift until Tarantino came along and opened Pandoraโ€™s box.

All this makes Blood Father more compelling than the Mad Max films or such prime Gibson vehicles as Lethal Weapon, Conspiracy Theory, or Tequila Sunrise. Link proves resourceful, whether dealing with drug fiends (Diego Luna plays the most treacherous of the Sicario), his partner-in-rehab (William H. Macy), or other ex-con low-lifes (Michael Parks breathing cold fire as a seller of Nazi paraphernalia). Link is battered, flawed, yet principled โ€” a 21st-century man such as Lydia childishly left home to find โ€” and Gibsonโ€™s star presence brings his torment close. โ€œI broke a lot of things. All I can do now is not drink,โ€ he confesses. This self-assessment links Link to the worldly criticism he gives his wayward daughter: โ€œYou have the mindset of a battered housewife,โ€ and โ€œYou lie like a child.โ€ Link and his daughter are both millennials.

Embedded video

Gibsonโ€™s parent-child rapport with Moriarty adds to their moral development. In action-movie mode, Gibson avoids self-pity; instead, the reckless side of his masculinity reveals how outside pressure can lead to self-destructive habits. Linkโ€™s he-man forearms bear a โ€œLost Soulโ€ tattoo. This characterization has the frankness that B-movies boast over big-budget arrogance. Director Jean-Franรงois Richet crafts Blood Father as an efficient genre movie about the cost of rehabilitation and, as such, acknowledges the difficult, personal American endeavors that Tarantinoโ€™s films falsify.

At a press screening of Tarantinoโ€™s Kill Bill, a not-bright film reviewer brought his teenage son, and they giggled and bonded over the freaky bedlam. Linkโ€™s defense of his daughter attests to different values. Although Gibsonโ€™s films always showed ambivalence about our cultureโ€™s relation to violence, in Blood Father, he offers a necessary reproof to Tarantino culture. So Gibson lets Parks (in a finer performance than he gave in Kill Bill) make an ironic speech exposing the cultureโ€™s ethical betrayal. Perhaps this principled insight is why Gibson was crucified.

* * *

Another new western, David Mackenzieโ€™s Hell or High Water, further challenges Hollywoodโ€™s unethical trends. It twists the outlawry of two white Texas brothers, Chris Pineโ€™s conflicted Toby Howard and Ben Fosterโ€™s ex-con Tanner Howard, into a study of millennial cynicism. The Howard boys rob banks in response to the recent mortgage crisis, which jeopardized their family home. Their actions are no less criminal than the banking systemโ€™s โ€” as over-explained in The Big Short โ€” but the impulses Pine and Foster act out and the reasoning offered by Mackenzie and screenwriter Taylor Sheridan are more affecting. This film is a socially conscious re-think of the recession and โ€” more strikingly โ€” of the Coen brothersโ€™ No Country for Old Men.

No Country teased the specter of cosmic (and comic) nihilism, impressing audiences with cleverness yet leaving them desolate. But Mackenzie and Sheridan start out with a sense of home-grown desolation. They reverse the Coensโ€™ process, bringing realism to myth and connecting the Howardsโ€™ anti-social grievance to the weary, old-fashioned pragmatism of white Texas Ranger Marcus Hamilton (Jeff Bridges) and his bi-racial deputy, Alberto Parker (Gil Birmingham).

Embedded video

The filmโ€™s range of poor white, Hispanic, and Native American characters displays uncanny class awareness. (โ€œHow do you make a living in this town?โ€ Alberto smirks when his and Marcusโ€™s robbery investigation takes them to a backwater.) The tough American truths include a vigilante shoot-out that corroborates the gun-culture jest that opens Blood Father. Liberals might not like this, but it feels authentic and works as pure folklore. So do the brief, sharp characterizations of an amorous waitress, a defensive Comanche at a casino, and a no-nonsense old lady โ€” each confrontation represents our divided personal perspectives.

All genre movies are contrived, but both Hell or High Water and Blood Father dramatize genuine emotion. Chris Pineโ€™s intense, suffering movie-star blue eyes (as bright and romantic as Gibsonโ€™s used to be) match the gravity of Bridgesโ€™s and Birminghamโ€™s lived-in humor and cynicism. Their complicated differences meet in a final scene โ€” a moral draw โ€” that defines how we live today.

Individual and communal American realities distinguish Hell or High Water and Blood Father. Toby laments, โ€œI been poor my whole life. Itโ€™s like a disease passing from generation to generation.โ€ And in Blood Father, screenwriter Andrea Berloff (Oliver Stoneโ€™s World Trade Center) reveals another political truth: โ€œThis country even turns radicals into commodities.โ€ These two modern westerns confide the toughest Obama-era observations that Hollywood has yet dared. Better than the Coensโ€™ slick treatment of hipster pessimism, these unpretentious B-movies speak truth to hipness.