Bragg Shouldn’t Be Prosecuting Trump Absent a Serious Crime and Strong Evidence

His charges, even in the unlikely event he can prove them, are too trivial to warrant the baleful consequences that come with them.

Share this story

Left: Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg speaks to attendees during the National Action Network National Convention in New York City, April 7, 2022. Right: Then-president Donald Trump speaks during a ceremony in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., December 3, 2020.

Eduardo Munoz, Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

Stipulated: No one is above the law.

Stipulated: If a person has committed a serious crime, and prosecutors are in a position to prove it with strong evidence, that person should be charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced to prison. The happenstance that the person is a former president and present presidential candidate does not, and must not, make him immune from prosecution.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement