It was disorienting when contraception suddenly became a political issue at the behest of Democrats during the Republican presidential primaries of 2012.

Now, it is clear why that happened (in addition to phonying up a political issue): The secular Left wishes to use the mostly uncontroversial issue of birth control as the stalking horse for using health care to remake society in its own image.

Latest evidence: An article in USCโ€™s Religion Dispatches by Patricia Miller. The writer objects to the latest attempt by the Obamacarians to force religious non profits to to insure contraception even if that violates their faith. (Now, instead of advising their insurers about the objection, apparently such organizations will have to notify HHS, which will contact the insurance carrier.) From, โ€œObama Caves on (Another) Contraception Exemption:โ€

Itโ€™s likely that the number of employers who seek to duck the contraceptive mandate will be small. But imagine a scenario where a larger number of employers seeks to escape a costly mandate, such as equal access to in vitro fertilization procedures for straight and gay couples, for supposedly religious reasons and hundreds flood HHS with generic opt-out letters that donโ€™t identify a specific insurer.
Or a future administration that is less dedicated to contraceptive access. Itโ€™s not hard to see how the lack of bureaucratic regularity could undermine access to contraception for women.

See the agenda? Break the back of religious freedom with the contraception mandateโ€“to which few other than orthodox Catholics objectโ€“and then use the precedents thereby established to force religious objectors to cover abortion, assisted suicide (if legal), sex change surgery (already happening), etc..

And hereโ€™s the broader strategy: Redefine life-style enhancing โ€œconsumeristโ€ elective procedures as โ€œmedically necessaryโ€ for insurance purposes--as California just did to force Catholic colleges to insure all abortionsโ€“and stuff it down religious traditionalistsโ€™ throats by making them pay for it.

Then when religious pro-lifers push back politically or sue, pundits like Miller squawk about bossy theocrats denying their fellow citizensโ€™ โ€œrightsโ€ to an abortion or a sex change (or pick your elective procedure).

Whereโ€™s the comity? Whereโ€™s the tolerance? Ah, those virtues are fast becoming one-way streets.

And thatโ€™s how you turn freedom of religion into a vestige โ€œfreedom of worshipโ€ and use health care as an authoritarian cultural bludgeon.