Cornell and the Modern Sexual ‘Contract’

We’ve lost the confidence to say that some kinds of sex ought not to be had at all, even by people who are free to choose.

Share this story

Demonstrators hold signs during a Justice for Survivors rally outside Day Hall at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., October 5, 2026.

Lauren Petracca/Reuters

In the context of the discourse over Cornell (which I otherwise intend to continue avoiding), Oliver Traldi, a philosopher at the University of Toledo and an occasional National Review contributor, argues against the familiar complaint that modern sexual ethics has been reduced to “consent.” He says this overlooks all manner of judgments people routinely make about putatively consensual sex. His examples include “misrepresentation, infidelity, mismatched expectations about the future, age and power disparities” and even bad sex, which, he observes, “is frequently moralized.” Josh Barro agrees that these examples demonstrate the persistence of moral standards beyond consent.

I don’t think they establish that at all.

Daniel Foster

About the Author

Daniel Foster

Daniel Foster is a contributing editor at National Review.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement